Skip to main content
. 2006 Apr 19;2006(2):CD005321. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005321.pub2

Huskisson 1999.

Methods Randomised
 Controlled
 Trial
 Blind observer
 Parallel‐group
 Placebo‐ controlled
 Single centre,
 Principal efficacy criteria: ITT
 all other efficacy: per protocol n=81
Participants Country:
 England
 Mean age: 65
 % Female: 67
 Mean disease duration: NR
 Duration:6 mth
 Number randomised:100
 (HA 50, PL 50)
 Inclusion:
 fully ambulant
 mono or bilateral knee OA
 Grade 2 to 3 Kellgren and Lawrence within 6 mth prior
 consistent pain for 3 mth prior
 moderate or severe pain on walking at screen and baseline visits
 Exclusion:
 Grade 4 Kellgren and Lawrence
 serious functional impair‐
 ment at knee
 associated OA of hip that interferes with knee assessment
 OA of any other jt that affect knee assessment
 psoriasis
 radiographic evidence of sacroilitis or any other joint disease other than OA
 known or suspected jt infection
 poor general health or other conditions preventing hospital attendance
 skin conditions overlying jt affecting injection
 painful knee conditons other than OA
 severe hepatic or renal disease or major medical
 conditions
 use of IA steroid or radiocolloid within 3 mth
 Baseline values:
 pain on walking
 HA:65.8, PL:61.9
 Lequesne
 HA:13.4, PL:14.0
Interventions Hyalgan (20mg/2 ml) 5 weekly injections
 Placebo: saline
 2 ml 5 weekly injections
 Concurrent therapy:
 Existing analgesic & NSAID continued as considered appro‐
 priate by referring physician
Outcomes pain on walking (100 mm VAS)
 Lequesne ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
 knee pain at rest (100 mm VAS)
 joint tenderness,
 swelling (4 point:
 none,mild,mod‐
 erate, severe)
 am stiffness, in‐
 activity stiffness
 (min), pt. global impression (excellent, fair,
 poor, useless)
 satisfaction index
Notes Jadad's:4/5
 R‐1,B‐2,W‐1
 Effusions aspirated
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear