Skip to main content
. 2006 Apr 19;2006(2):CD005321. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005321.pub2

Leopold 2003.

Methods Randomised
 Controlled
 Trial
 Single‐blind
 Blinded assessor
 Parallel‐group
 Single centre
Participants Country:
 USA
 Mean age: 65
 % Female: 54
 Disease duration: NR
 Duration: 6 mth
 Number randomised: 100
 (HA 50, CS 50)
 Inclusion:
 >18 y
 x‐ray evidence of symptomatic OA of the knee
 dissatisfaction with prior attempts at non‐
 operative management modalities (e.g.
 NSAID, oral
 analgesics, nutritional supplements, PT, braces)
 symptomatic=
 pain with weight
 bearing at TB and/or PF with one or more of:
 loss of cartilage thickness, osteo‐
 phyte formation, subchondral sclerosis, cysts
 Exclusion:
 pregnant
 lactating
 x‐ray signs of bone‐on‐bone
 arthritis, chrondrocalcin‐
 osis,
 physical exam showed an insufficiency of collateral ligament or insufficiency of anterior or posterior cruciate ligament with concomitant symtomatic giving‐way of the affected extremity, or current infection in affected extremity
 history of crystalline arthropathy or inflammatory arthritis, neuropathic arthropathy, an ia injection with any
 corticosteroid or any HA within the previous 3 mth
 allergy or hyper‐
 sensitivity to study medications, eggs, feathers, avian proteins, or chickens
Interventions Hylan G‐F 20
 3 weekly injections (with effusion aspiration)
 Betamethasone sodium phos‐
 phate‐betameth‐
 asone acetate 2 ml mixed in 4 ml of Marcaine (bupivacaine) and 4 ml of lido‐
 caine (effusion not aspirated) & could have 2nd injection at any time (48%)
 (Celestone 
 Soluspan)
 Concurrent therapy: NSAID permitted but tracked (HA ‐ 64%, CS ‐56% usage)
Outcomes Modified Knee Society clinical rating scale (100 points),
 WOMAC OA Index (Likert),
 pain (100 mm VAS)
Notes Jadad's:3/5
 R‐2,B‐0,W‐1
 Study was independently funded. Base‐
 line significant
 difference in x‐ray severity: more moderate in HA; more mild or severe in CS.
 If bilateral, only one knee analysed.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk A ‐ Adequate