Skip to main content
. 2006 Apr 19;2006(2):CD005321. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005321.pub2

Ozturk 2005.

Methods Randomised
 Controlled
 Trial
 Single‐blind
 Single centre
 7‐day washout of NSAID
Participants Country: Turkey
 Mean age: 58.03
 % Female: 97.5
 Mean disease duration: NR
 Duration: 1 y
 Number randomised: 47
 (HA: 24, HA+TA: 23)
 Inclusion:
 OA of the knee according to ACR criteria,
 Kellgren‐Lawrence grades II or III radiographically confirmed,
 pain in affected knee for at least 6 mth
 Exclusion:
 received intra‐
 articular injection in the joint and/or attend physiotherapy for the affected knee within 6 mth prior to study,
 history of allergy or hypersensitive to drugs or eggs,
 ascertained or suspected to be pregnant or lactacting,
 known or suspected joint infection or a specific condition (neoplasms, diabetes mellitus, paresis, osteonecrosis, recent trauma) or poor general health that would interfere with the functional assessments during the study
 Baseline values:
 range of motion
 HA: 112.0
 HA+TA: 118.8
 50‐foot walking time
 HA: 23.7
 HA+TA: 22.6
 pain (VAS)
 HA: 66.7
 HA+TA: 72.6
 WOMAC pain
 HA: 14.3
 HA+TA: 16.3
 WOMAC stiffness
 HA: 4.1
 HA+TA: 4.1
 WOMAC function
 HA: 53.3
 HA+TA: 49.0
 WOMAC total
 HA: 71.8
 HA+TA: 69.6
Interventions Orthovisc (2 ml Biomeks) alone 3 weekly injections
 (Days 0,7,14) then 3 injections at month 6,
 Combined group: same as above but prior to lst and 4th HA injection, effusions aspirated and then 1 ml triamcinolone acetonid (Kenacort‐A, Bristol Myers Squibb)
 Concurrent therapy: paracetamol to a maximum of 2 g daily as considered appropriate by the physician was permitted;
 NSAID not permitted.
Outcomes WOMAC OA Index (Likert),
 pain (0‐100 mm VAS), ROM ‐ flexion only with a goniometer,
 50 foot walking time (sec), assessment of effusion (peri‐
 pheral measurement of knee),
 MRI ‐ cartilage evaluated with an eight grade system by 2 independent observers
Notes Jadad's: 3/5
 R‐2, B‐0, W‐1
 No statistically significant differences in demographic or clinical data at baseline.
 Although 47 patients enrolled, 7 in the HA+TA group were withdrawn as they did not meet inclusion criteria.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk A ‐ Adequate