Skip to main content
. 2006 Apr 19;2006(2):CD005321. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005321.pub2

Shichikawa 1983b.

Methods Randomised
 Controlled
 Double‐blind
 Multicentre (n=16)
 Safety analysis:
 ITT, n=103
 Efficacy analysis:
 per protocol, n=98
Participants Country:
 Japan
 Mean age: 62
 % Female: 83
 Mean disease
 duration: NR
 Duration: 5 wk
 Number randomised:107
 (HA 52, PL 55)
 Inclusion:
 apparent clinical signs with pain on movement
 xray at least 1 of joint space narrowing, spur formation, osteosclerosis
 consent
 Exclusion:
 moderate to severe JSN
 varus or valgus
 deformities
 synovial effusion
 IA corticosteroid injection in past 2 wk
 pregnant or lactating females
 hard to communicate
 cases thought to be inadequate for trial by doctors in charge
 Baseline values:
 % pt moderate
 walking pain
 HA:52, PL:46
 ROM
 HA:133.4,
 PL:128.6
 pain score
 HA:1.03, PL:1.12
Interventions sodium hyaluronate 5.0 ml of 0.5% SPH solution 
 5 weekly injections
 + 2 sugar coated lactose pills tid
 Placebo: 5.0 ml of 0.01% SPH solution 5 weekly injections 
 + 2 sugar coated lactose pills tid
 Concurrent therapy:
 No "new" arthritis therapy permitted
Outcomes pain: rest, walking, up and down stairs, press, flexion and extension, sense of fever, swelling, range of motion, ballotement of patella
 (4 point scale:
 no symptom, mild, moderate, severe)
 disturbance of 4 activities of daily living: walk 10 min,
 up/down stairs,
 squat to pick up
 things from floor,
 sitting on floor or
 tatami: 5 ranks:
 can do as the
 normal people,
 scarcely possible by one‐
 self and not so in‐
 convenient,
 scarcely possible
 by oneself but inconvenience necessary for aid, totally impossible
 diary for activities of daily living and pain (knee pain at rest and at the beginning of
 motion:0=no pain,1=mild, 2=
 painful but mo‐
 bile,3=painful &
 immobile,4=un‐
 endurable pain & can do nothing)
 general improve‐
 ment (1‐7: sig.
 improved,moder‐ately improved, lightly improved,
 no change,lightly worsened, mod‐
 erately worsened
 sig. worsened)
 impression by pt
 (1‐7:sig. improved,fairly
 improved,slightly
 improved, no
 change,slightly
 worsened, fairly
 worsened, sig.
 worsened)
 general evalua‐
 tion (1‐7: sig.
 improved,moder‐ately improved,
 slightly improved,
 no change, slightly worsened,
 moderately worsened, sig.
 worsened)
 general safety
 (1‐3: no side
 effect,side effect seen but can continue treat‐
 ment, stop treat‐
 ment because of side effect) 
 usefulness judged on general improvement and general safety: 7 ranks:
 extremely useful,
 fairly useful,
 slightly useful,
 cannot judge
 whether useful or
 not useful, 
 slightly undesir‐
 able, fairly unde‐
 sirable, extremely unde‐
 sirable
Notes Jadad's:4/5
 R‐1,B‐2,W‐1
 Pt with moderate to severe synovial effusion excluded.
 If bilateral, evaluation completed on knee fulfilling entry criteria.
 Test drug provided by Seikagaku Kogyo Co., Ltd.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk A ‐ Adequate