Skip to main content
. 2006 Apr 19;2006(2):CD005321. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005321.pub2

Wobig 1998.

Methods Randomised
 Controlled
 Trial
 Double‐blind 
 Screen blinded patient
 Blinded assessor
 Multicentre (n=4)
 2 wk washout
 of NSAID and analgesics.
 ITT analysis
Participants Country:
 Germany
 Mean age: 62
 % Female: 65
 Mean disease duration: 6 y
 Duration: 12 wk
 Telephone follow‐up
 at 26 wk
 Number randomised: 110
 (HA 52, PL 54,
 HA+PL 4)
 [117 knees:
 HA 57, PL 60]
 Inclusion:
 > 18 y
 male & female
 chronic primary OA of knee of Larsen Grade 1‐3
 ESR < 40 mm/h
 RF < 1:160
 daily pain on activity and persistent pain despite use of NSAIDs or analgesics
 Exclusion:
 pts with effusion in knee
 Baseline values:
 pt wtbearing pain
 HA:71, PL:75
 pt night pain
 HA:42, PL:47
 MD wtbearing 
 pain
 HA:71, PL:75
 MD night pain
 HA:41, PL:47
 MD loss of 
 activity
 HA:59, PL:67
Interventions Hylan G‐F 20
 (2 ml)
 3 weekly injections
 Placebo: phosphate‐
 buffered saline
 2 ml 
 3 weekly injections
 Concurrent therapy:
 Standard care per‐
 mitted: steroids, 
 NSAIDs, analgesics,
 PT, surgery
Outcomes pt: pain wt bearing, at rest during night, decrease during most painful movement, treatment success
 MD: extent of pt's loss of activity while performing difficult daily tasks & treatment success
 all above on 100 mm VAS
 Assessments:
 Wk 0,1,2,3,8,12,
 26
Notes Jadad's:4/5
 R‐1,B‐2,W‐1
 Local analgesia was optional.
 If bilateral OA, only most painful knee treated.
 7 pts bilateral ‐ 14 knees: 6 HA , 8 PL. Each knee randomised and analysed independently for efficacy but for safety these pts. were considered individuals. Time between treatment of two knees varied from 0 to 153 days.
 Pts with effusions excluded. 
 Arthrocentesis with removal of effusion if present. At baseline, Larsen xray grade III to IV:
 HA: 28% versus PL:57%(p<0.05),
 duration of OA <1 y: HA: 28% versus PL: 10% (p<0.025)
 Work was supported by Biomatrix, Inc.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk A ‐ Adequate