Skip to main content
. 2006 Apr 19;2006(2):CD005321. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005321.pub2

Wobig 1999b (Artz).

Methods Randomised
 Controlled
 Trial
 Double‐blind
 Blinded assessor
 Multicentre (n=6)
 2 wk washout
 of NSAIDs and analgesics.
 Efficacy analysis:
 both ITT and per protocol.
 Tolerability analysis: ITT
Participants Country:
 Germany
 Mean age: 60
 % Female: 51
 Mean disease duration: 4.6 y
 Duration: 12 wk
 Number randomised: 
 132 pts (148 knees) in 4 arms of trial.
 In 2 arms GF/AR:
 70 patients
 (GF 38, AR 32)
 [73 knees:
 GF 38, AR 35]
 [Healon 39 knees, NE hylan 36 knees]
 Inclusion:
 > 18 y
 primary OA knee (Larsen 1 to 3)
 ESR < 40 mm/h
 RF < 1:160
 daily, persistent pain despite use of pain relieving
 medications
 Exclusion:
 free of pain in OA knee
 detectable effusion in joint at time of first treatment
 considered unreliable by the
 investigator
 Baseline values:
 pt wtbearing pain
 HA:70, AR:72
 MD wtbearing pain
 HA:69, PL:72
Interventions Hylan G‐F 20
 (2 ml)
 3 weekly injections,
 Artz
 (2 ml)
 3 weekly injections,
 Healon
 3 weekly injections,
 Nonelastoviscous denatured hylan fluid
 3 weekly injections
 Subcutaneous local anesthetic optional in both groups.
 Concurrent therapy:
 Standard care per‐
 mitted
Outcomes wt bearing pain by pt and MD on 100 mm VAS
 overall treatment response by pt & MD(100mmVAS)
 improvement on most painful knee movement by pt 100 mm VAS
 Assessments:
 Wk 0,1,2,3,8,12
Notes Jadad's:4/5
 R‐1,B‐2,W‐1
 Pt with detectable effusion excluded
 Arthocentesis with removal of effusion if present.
 If bilateral OA both knees could be treated and evaluated. 16 patients had bilateral OA. Each knee randomised and independently evaluated for efficacy. Time between treatment of two knees varied from 0 to 23 days but 11/16 had the same day.
 4‐arm study but only 2 arms reported in publication (Hylan G‐F 20 and Artz). Biomatrix, Inc. provided support for this work and performed all elastoviscosity analyses.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk A ‐ Adequate