Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 28;37(3):554–559. doi: 10.1038/s41433-022-01986-8

Table 3.

Differences in characteristics and outcomes of eyes with primary YAGPC and those requiring further YAGPC.

No Further YAGPC 6213 (98.5%) Further YAGPC 95 (1.5%) p value
Age (years, IQR) 75.0 (67.0 to 82.0) 66.0 (51.0 to 78.0) <0.001
Ocular co-morbidity (% Yes)
   No 4565 (98.9%) 51 (1.1%) <0.001
   Yes 1648 (97.4%) 44 (2.6%)
Gender
   Male 2649 (98.5%) 39 (1.5%) 0.835
   Female 3564 (98.5%) 56 (1.5%)
Operator Grade
 ANP 2073 (99.3%) 15 (0.7%) <0.001
 Ophthalmologist 4140 (98.1%) 80 (1.9%)
   SAS 1191 (98.0%) 24 (2.0%) 0.982
   Resident 797 (98.2%) 15 (1.8%)
   Fellow 940 (98.0%) 19 (2.0%)
   Consultant 1212 (98.2%) 22 (1.8%)
Pre-YAGPC VA (LogMAR) 0.48 (0.30 to 0.78) 0.48 (0.30 to 1.00) 0.188
Post-YAGPC VA (LogMAR) 0.18 (0.10 to 0.30) 0.30 (0.18 to 0.78) <0.001
LogMAR Gain 0.30 (0.08 to 0.48) 0.18 (0.00 to 0.48) 0.023

ANP advanced nurse practitioner.

Data are reported as median (interquartile range). Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare Age between groups. Chi-Squared (>2 groups) and fisher-exact test (2 groups) were otherwise used to compare nominal groups. Statistical significance in bold.