Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 28;17(2):e0264569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264569

Table 1. Comparisons of proprioception variables between garment type and time course of change (mean±SD).

Time points
Parameters
Baseline Fatigue Rest 10 min Rest 20 min Rest 30 min Rest 1 hour
AP displacement (cm)
 CG 3.80±1.28 4.04±1.39 3.80±1.12 3.75±0.80 3.61±0.75 3.33±0.76
 SP 4.18±1.50 3.91±0.84 4.41±1.87 3.46±1.02 4.28±1.97 4.04±1.05
CG vs SP p value p = 0.386 p = 0.735 p = 0.309 p = 0.459 p = 0.321 p = 0.030*
ML displacement (cm)
 CG 5.92±1.07# 7.80±0.82 6.27±1.28# 5.52±0.95# 5.35±1.24# 5.12±1.20#
 SP 6.18±1.10 8.02±1.05 6.55±1.17 6.27±1.02 6.25±1.08 5.75±1.13
CG vs SP p value p = 0.374 p = 0.246 p = 0.073 p = 0.031* p = 0.003* p = 0.013*
Absolute error (°)
 CG 2.0±1.2# 6.0±3.5 3.1±2.4# 1.9±1.5# 1.6±1.0#,a 1.0±0.7#,a
 SP 1.9±2.7 5.9±3.8 2.1±1.5 1.7±1.5 1.4±1.2 1.4±1.5
CG vs SP p value p = 0.916 p = 0.819 p = 0.296 p = 0.718 p = 0.770 p = 0.426

#: p < 0.05 compared with fatigue onset; AP, anteroposterior; ML, mediolateral; CG, compression garment; SP, sport pants;

*, p<0.05, CG compared with SP;

a, p<0.05, compared with rest 10 min; SD, standard deviation.