Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 24;15:365–373. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S348282

Table 1.

Consequences of Generic Prescribing

Stakeholders Possible Pros Possible Cons
Patients ● Reduced cost of medications.
● Improved adherence to medications due to convenience in finding prescribed medicines.
● Improved accessibility and availability of medicines regardless of their socio-economic factors.
● No economic burden for therapeutically equivalent medicines.
● Possibility of therapeutic failure in patients taking narrow therapeutic index medicine due to fluctuation in plasma drug concentration.
● Possibility of receiving the substandard products from pharmacies.
● A paradoxical decrease in adherence with generics because of the change in pill colour, packaging and labeling.
Pharmacists ● An unethical prescription may be revoked. The professional paradigm shift from prescribers to pharmacists
● Decreased inventory holding costs.
● Less chances of medication/dispensing errors particularly for the sound-alike and look-alike medicines.
● Efficient medication counselling possible.
● Paradigm shift of marketing influence from prescribers to the pharmacist, leading to physicians’ dissatisfaction.
● Greater obligation in ensuring quality medicines to the patients and pharmacists.
Prescribers ● No need to memorize a variety of the brands available in the market by the prescribers.
● More transparent relationship will build between pharmaceutical manufacturers and prescribers.
● Encouraged practice of ethical prescribing.
● Less prescribing errors.
● Easy availability of the prescribed medications.
● Writing multicomponent and fixed combination products may be tedious for the prescribers.
● Commission-based prescriptions, if any, get hampered.
Pharmaceutical manufacturers ● Allow smaller manufacturers to enter the market in a more accessible, cheaper and faster way.
● A new horizon for pharmaceutical manufacturers opened.
● Concept of BABE studies can be implemented in Nepal.
● The current push marketing adopted by most pharmaceutical companies may need reconsideration.
● Competitive market culture developed.
● Working modality of the marketing team of the pharmaceutical companies in Nepal may need to be changed.

Notes: Data from these studies.62,63