Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 10;81:199–210. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2022-0017

Table 1.

Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) ratings and Oxford evidence levels of the included studies

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 TOTAL Evidence level
Amirthalingam et al. (2017) Yes 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 6 1b
Aube et al. (2020) Yes 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 4 2b
Brigatto et al. (2019) Yes 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 5 1b
Heaselgrave et al. (2019) Yes 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 5 1b
Radaelli et al. (2015) Yes 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 6 1b
Scarpelli et al. (2020) Yes 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 4 2b
Schoenfeld et al. (2019) Yes 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 2b
Total 4.714

Items in the PEDro scale: 1 = eligibility criteria were specified; 2 = subjects were randomly allocated to groups; 3 = allocation was concealed; 4 = the groups were similar at baseline regarding the most important prognostic indicators; 5 = measures of 1 key outcome were obtained from 85% of subjects initially allocated to groups; 6 = all subjects for whom outcome measures were available received the treatment or control condition as allocated or, where this was not the case, data for at least 1 key outcome were analyzed by “intention to treat”; 7 = the results of between-group statistical comparisons are reported for at least 1 key outcome; 8 = the study provides both point measures and measures of variability for at least 1 key outcome.