Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 20;43(3):219–229. doi: 10.1055/a-1539-6702

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Changes in the exhaustion velocity (m/min) during the ILT at weeks 0, 4 and 8 (a) . The training volume (min) is shown from the sixth to the eighth weeks (b) . Percent alteration (%) in the rotarod test between weeks 4 and 8 (c) . The data represent the means±SEMs of n=16. @ Statistically significant (P<0.05) difference compared with week 0; @@@ statistically significant (P<0.001 ) difference compared with week 0; @@@@ statistically significant (P<0.0001) difference compared with week 0; + statistically significant (P<0 . 05) difference compared with week 4; ++++ statistically significant (P<0.0001) difference compared with week 4; $ statistically significant (P<0.05) difference compared with the CON group at week 4; * statistically significant (P<0.05) difference compared with the first session in week 8; ** statistically significant (P<0.01) difference compared with the first session in week 8; **** statistically significant (P<0.0001) difference compared with the first session in week 8; #### statistically significant (P<0.0001) difference compared with the second session in week 8; †† statistically significant (P<0.05) difference compared with the NT group.