Table 4.
Stage | Feedback | Main innovations |
---|---|---|
1 | Two rounds of feedback on QoE-SPEO v.1 received from two WHO experts and five individual experts on systematic review methods and integrated in QoE-SPEO v.2 | - Adopted and/or revised steps and components from existing tools - Developed a new step - Developed new components - Introduced concepts, terms and examples from occupational health and safety |
2 | First round of pilot testing on QoE-SPEO v.2, feedback received from ten pilot testers and integrated in QoE-SPEO v.3 | - Made minor editorial changes |
3 | Second round of pilot testing on QoE-SPEO v.3 received from 20 individual experts in occupational health, occupational safety, and/or exposure science that applied QoE-SPEO v.3 in a systematic review of prevalence studies for the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates and integrated QoE-SPEO v.4 | - Reviewed and improved the concept, definition and term for “expected heterogeneity” - Refined considerations and criteria for some downgrade domains - Added definitions of quality of evidence ratings |