Table 2.
WAIS-IV SUBTESTS | Musicians N = 24 (18 females) |
Non-musicians N = 24 (19 females) |
Group comparison | |
---|---|---|---|---|
p value | Cohen’s d | |||
Digit span forward (WM) | 11 (1.89) | 11 (1.35) | p = 1 | d = 0 |
Digit span backward (WM) | 9.79 (2.17) | 9.08 (1.56) | p = 0.53 | d = 0.37 |
Digit span sequencing (WM) | 9.87 (2.72) | 9.79 (1.15) | p = 1 | d = 0.04 |
Arithmetic (WM) | 15.83 (2.93) | 14.92 (3.52) | p = 0.53 | d = 0.28 |
WM index (composite score) | 106.7 (14.87) | 102.3 (12.97) | p = 0.53 | d = 0.32 |
Coding (PS) | 91.58 (15.68) | 78.83 (13.6) | p = 0.032 | d = 0.87 |
Symbol search (PS) | 41.29 (8.35) | 41.08 (6.6) | p = 1 | d = 0.03 |
PS index (composite score) | 117.8 (15.73) | 108.8 (14.18) | p = 0.164 | d = 0.61 |
p values refer to the comparison between groups through t tests (FDR corrected). The last column represents the effect size expressed with the d of Cohen. The WM and PS indexes (composite scores) are computed based on the raw score of each subtest, which was converted into a scaled score taking into account the age of participants (based on normative data), and then transformed in the final standardized index with M = 100 and SD = 15.
WM working memory, PS processing speed