Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 21;86(2):421–442. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01519-0

Table 2.

Performance on the WAIS-IV subtests, separately for musicians and non-musicians

WAIS-IV SUBTESTS Musicians
N = 24 (18 females)
Non-musicians
N = 24 (19 females)
Group comparison
p value Cohen’s d
Digit span forward (WM) 11 (1.89) 11 (1.35) p = 1 d = 0
Digit span backward (WM) 9.79 (2.17) 9.08 (1.56) p = 0.53 d = 0.37
Digit span sequencing (WM) 9.87 (2.72) 9.79 (1.15) p = 1 d = 0.04
Arithmetic (WM) 15.83 (2.93) 14.92 (3.52) p = 0.53 d = 0.28
WM index (composite score) 106.7 (14.87) 102.3 (12.97) p = 0.53 d = 0.32
Coding (PS) 91.58 (15.68) 78.83 (13.6) p = 0.032 d = 0.87
Symbol search (PS) 41.29 (8.35) 41.08 (6.6) p = 1 d = 0.03
PS index (composite score) 117.8 (15.73) 108.8 (14.18) p = 0.164 d = 0.61

p values refer to the comparison between groups through t tests (FDR corrected). The last column represents the effect size expressed with the d of Cohen. The WM and PS indexes (composite scores) are computed based on the raw score of each subtest, which was converted into a scaled score taking into account the age of participants (based on normative data), and then transformed in the final standardized index with M = 100 and SD = 15.

WM working memory, PS processing speed