Table 2.
Effect of nationality, emotion and ‘emotion x nationality’ on each behavioural and physiological measure
Nationality (GB–PT) | Emotion | Emotion × nationality | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Behavioural measures of emotion recognition | Accuracy | F(1, 60) = 56.40, FDR p < .001*, ηp2 = .49, 95% CI [.30, .61], d = -1.82 | F(5, 300) = 7.94, FDR p < .001*, ηp2 = .12, 95% CI [.05, .17] | F(5, 300) = 16.58, FDR p < .001*, ηp2 = .22, 95% CI [.13, .28] |
Response latency | F(1, 60) = 72.78, FDR p < .001*, ηp2 = .55, 95% CI [.37, .66], d = 2.06 | F(4.30, 257.71) = 18.73, FDR p < .001*, ηp2 = .24, 95% CI [.14, .31] | F(4.30, 257.71) = 2.89, FDR p = .020*, ηp2 = .05, 95% CI [.00, .09] | |
Behavioural measures of emotion authenticity | Rating | F(1, 62) = 0.87, FDR p = .355 ηp2 = 0.01, 95% CI [.00, .11], d = -0.22 | F(4.06, 251.55) = 18.64, FDR p < .001*, ηp2 = .23, 95% CI [.13, .30] | F(4.06, 251.55) = 2.10, FDR p = .084, ηp2 = .03, 95% CI [.00, .07] |
Response latency | F(1,62) = 14.24, FDR p < .001*, ηp2 = .19, 95% CI [.04, .34], d = 0.90 | F(2.68, 165.91) = 4.92, FDR p = .004*, ηp2 = .07, 95% CI [.00, .13] | F(2.68, 163.20) = 2.63, FDR p = .084, ηp2 = .04, 95% CI [.00, .10] | |
Physiological measures of emotion recognition (skin conductance response, SCR) | SCR amplitude | Wald χ2 (1, N = 211) = 3.39, p = .066, d = 0.24 | Wald χ2 (5, N = 211) = 14.45, p = .013* | Wald χ2 (5, N = 211) = 2.83, p = .726 |
SCR latency | Wald χ2 (1, N = 211) = 0.42, p = .519, d = 0.08 | Wald χ2 (5, N = 211) = 23.43, p < .001* | Wald χ2 (5, N = 211) = 11.85, p = .037* | |
SCR rise time | Wald χ2 (1, N = 211) = 0.09, p = .764, d = 0.04 | Wald χ2 (5, N = 211) = 5.40, p = .369 | Wald χ2 (5, N = 211) = 5.10, p = .403 | |
SCR percentage | Wald χ2 (1, N = 330) = 0.44, p = .506, d = -0.07 | Wald χ2 (5, N = 211) = 2.84, p = .725 | Wald χ2 (5, N = 211) = 5.89, p = .318 |
Effects statistically significant at a p < .05 are marked with an asterisk