Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 6;29(2):193–208. doi: 10.1007/s12282-021-01323-z

Table 2.

BCT implemented per type of intervention and promise ratio

Types of interventions
Very promising
(n = 11)
Quite promising
(n = 13)
Non-promising
(n = 3)
All
(n = 27)
Promise ratio
OR Number
1.1 Goal setting (behaviour) 11 9 2 22 10
1.2 Problem solving 5 3 1 9 9
1.4 Action planning 0 1 0 1 1
1.5 Review behaviour goals 1 1 0 2 2
2.1 monitoring of behaviour by others without feedback 2 1 0 3 3
2.2 Feedback on behaviour 5 2 0 7 7
2.3 Self-monitoring of behaviour 5 5 1 11 11
2.4 Self-monitoring of outcomes of behaviour 4 3 0 7 7
2.5 Monitoring of outcomes of behaviour without feedback 0 3 0 3 3
2.6 Biofeedback 0 2 0 2 2
3.1 Social support (unspecified) 1 4 2 7 2.5
3.2 Social support (practical) 3 4 1 8 8
3.3 Social support (emotional) 4 2 1 7 7
4.1 Instruction on how to perform the behaviour 9 11 3 23 6.66
5.1 Information on health consequences 2 3 1 6 6
6.1 Demonstration of the behaviour 3 4 3 10 2.33
6.2 Social comparison 0 1 0 1 1
7.1 Prompts/cues 1 1 0 2 2
8.1 Behavioural practice/rehearsal 1 2 1 4 4
9.1 Credible source 2 2 1 5 5
10.1 Material incentive (behaviour) 2 3 1 6 6
10.4 Social reward 0 2 0 2 2
12.1 Restructuring the physical environment 1 0 0 1 1
12.5 Adding objects to the environment 9 3 1 13 13

Promise ratio denotes the number of very or quite-promising interventions in which a behaviour change technique occurred divided by the number of non-promising interventions in which it featured. Rows in bold denote BCTs associated with a promise rate > 2 or used in promising interventions in at least two interventions

If a BCT only appeared in promising interventions and in at least two intervention, the number of interventions in which it appeared is reported in italics