Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nephron. 2021 Sep 1;146(3):243–248. doi: 10.1159/000518632

Role of endothelial Prolyl-4-Hydroxylase Domain protein/Hypoxia-Inducible Factor Axis in Acute Kidney Injury

Ratnakar Tiwari 1, Pinelopi P Kapitsinou 1,#
PMCID: PMC8885783  NIHMSID: NIHMS1730438  PMID: 34515168

Abstract

Ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI) results from a cessation or restriction of blood supply to an organ followed by reestablishment of perfusion and reoxygenation. In the kidney, IRI due to transplantation, cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass, and other major vascular surgeries contributes to acute kidney injury (AKI), a clinical condition associated with significant morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients. In the postischemic kidney, endothelial damage promotes inflammatory responses and leads to persistent hypoxia of the renal tubular epithelium. Like other cell types, endothelial cells respond to low oxygen tension by multiple hypoxic signaling mechanisms. Key mediators of adaptation to hypoxia are Hypoxia-Inducible-Factors (HIF)-1 and -2, transcription factors whose activity is negatively regulated by prolyl-hydroxylase domain proteins 1 to 3 (PHD1 to PHD3). The PHD/HIF axis controls several processes determining injury outcome, including ATP generation, cell survival, proliferation, and angiogenesis. Here, we discuss recent advances in our understanding of the endothelial derived PHD/HIF signaling and its effects on postischemic AKI.

Keywords: Acute Kidney Injury, Hypoxia, Ischemia Reperfusion Injury, Endothelium, Hypoxia Inducible Factors, Prolyl-4-Hydroxylase Domain proteins

PHD/HIF axis regulates vascular responses

Endothelial cells play a major role in maintaining nutrient and oxygen supply to all tissues in the body by regulating vascular tone, inflammatory responses, hemostasis, and angiogenesis. Being the first cell layer in direct contact with the blood, endothelial cells cope with all alterations occurring within the blood. Among these alterations is the reduction in the oxygen tension, which can arise in the context of systemic or regional hypoxia. Cells respond to oxygen deprivation through multiple mechanisms, including the hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF), a “master” regulator of the hypoxic response.

HIF-1 and HIF-2 belong to the bHLH-PAS (basic helix loop helix-PER/ARNT/SIM) family of proteins, and consist of an oxygen-sensitive α-subunit and a constitutively expressed β-subunit, also known as ARNT [1]. Both transcription factors promote cellular adaptation to hypoxia by regulating genes that control processes involved in oxygen homeostasis, including anaerobic glucose metabolism, angiogenesis, and erythrocyte production. Under normoxic conditions, HIF-1α and HIF-2α undergo prolyl-hydroxylation by three Fe (II)- and 2-oxoglutarate (2OG)-dependent prolyl-4-hydroxylase domain (PHD) proteins, PHD1, 2 and 3 (also known as EGLN2, EGLN1, and EGLN3 respectively), which act as oxygen sensors [2]. HIF-α prolyl-hydroxylation promotes targeting for ubiquitination by the von Hippel-Lindau (pVHL)-E3-ubiquitin ligase complex and rapid proteasomal degradation. Hypoxia inhibits the catalytic activity of PHD enzymes, leading to HIF stabilization and transcriptional activation of ~200 hypoxia-regulated genes [2, 1].

In humans, VHL inactivation due to somatic mutations is frequent in nonhereditary kidney cancers while germline VHL mutations cause von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease, which is characterized by the development of angiogenic tumors such as hemangioblastomas, renal cell cancer, and pheochromocytomas [2]. Notably, germline homozygosity for a hypomorphic VHL allele results in polycythemia, thrombosis and vascular abnormalities [3]. Genetic studies performed on rodents also support a critical role for the PHD/HIF/VHL axis in vascular development and cardiovascular diseases. Global ablation of either ARNT (HIFβ) or HIF-1α subunit results in lethality due to abnormal embryonic vascularization [4]. HIF-2α deficiency results in variable phenotypes between genetic backgrounds, but defective cardiovascular and pulmonary function is a common feature shared by all the mutants [4]. Studies exploring the contribution of endothelial cell derived HIF signaling in these vascular abnormalities have yielded conflicting results probably due to spatiotemporal differences in Cre- recombinase activity between the different endothelial transgenic approaches employed. Specifically, partial neonatal lethality and vascular defects including cardiac hemorrhage and impaired hepatic vasculature were observed when ARNT was deleted in endothelial cells by the Tie2-Cre transgene [5]. Furthermore, inhibition of HIF-mediated transcription by a dominant-negative HIF mutant expressed in endothelial cells from the promoter/enhancer regions of the kinase insert domain protein receptor (Kdr) gene resulted in early embryonic lethality and multiple cardiovascular defects [6]. On the other hand, we found no apparent pathology following the Cdh5-Cre driven endothelial inactivation of both HIF-1α and HIF-2α [7].

Vascular pathology has been reported because of activation of HIF signaling by PHD2 deficiency. Specifically, germline inactivation of PHD2 caused embryonic demise between embryonic days 12.5 and 14.5 due to placental and heart defects [8], whereas inducible global PHD2 deletion resulted in excessive vascular growth and angiectasis in multiple organs [9]. Recently, we found that loss of endothelial PHD2 induced pulmonary arterial hypertension and vascular remodeling in a HIF-2α-dependent, and not HIF-1α-dependent, fashion. Furthermore, endothelial HIF-2α was required for the development of hypoxia-induced pulmonary hypertension [10]. Therefore, current evidence suggests a critical role for hypoxia signaling in vascular homeostasis and given the significant endothelial cell heterogeneity, the function of PHD/HIF axis in different vascular beds requires further investigation.

HIF activation protects against acute kidney injury

The kidney operates within a narrow range of tissue oxygenation; cortical PO2 is 15–50 mmHg, while medullary PO2 is lower (5–25mmHg) based on measurements performed by Clark oxygen microelectrodes [11]. High oxygen utilization due to energy demanding transport processes in conjunction with changes in local perfusion and arterial-to-venous oxygen shunting make the kidney vulnerable to hypoxic injury, particularly the outer medulla [12]. Indeed, among several clinical conditions leading to AKI, kidney hypoxia has emerged as a key driver contributing to cell death and injury. In the context of systemic or regional hypoxia, activation of the HIF pathway is a central mechanism by which kidney cells respond and adapt to changes in renal oxygenation. Under acute hypoxia, HIF-1α has been detected in tubular and glomerular epithelial cells, whereas HIF-2α was found in glomerular cells, peritubular endothelial cells, and interstitial fibroblast-like cells [13]. In the ischemic kidney, HIF-2α showed similar pattern of expression and HIF-1α was predominantly induced in tubular cells localized to the corticomedullary junction and renal papilla [13]. Because the endogenous response to ischemia appears submaximal, several groups have examined the cytoprotective potential of approaches boosting HIF activation prior to ischemic injury. Indeed, it has been consistently demonstrated that systemic HIF activation by PHD inhibition prior to injury attenuates ischemic kidney injury (Table 1) [1418]. While the concerted transcriptional activation of genes involved in cellular energy metabolism, antioxidant responses, antiapoptotic pathways and immunity appears to have a central role in PHD/HIF mediated renoprotection, significant complexity arises from cell type-, isoform- and context-specific responses. Both HIF-α isoforms have been implicated in dictating AKI outcomes as heterozygosity for either HIF-1α or HIF-2α exacerbated renal IRI [16]. Furthermore, systemic HIF activation by VHL loss or xenon-mediated enhanced translation ameliorated AKI [19, 20]. HIF-activation limited to the kidney by nanoparticle-based targeted delivery of PHD2 siRNA was sufficient to protect against IRI [21]. Accordingly, VHL deletion restricted to the thick ascending limb conveyed substantial protection against ischemic kidney injury elucidating the importance of this nephron segment [22]. Besides renal IRI, HIF activation has been shown to induce robust renoprotection in other AKI models, including kidney transplantation, sepsis and cisplatin induced nephrotoxicity (Table 1) [2328]. However, in contrast to the consistent protection observed when HIF is activated prior to insults, the effects of postischemic HIF-PHD inhibition remain controversial. One study showed that administration of the PHD inhibitor TRC160334 at 2h, 6h, and 10h post kidney ischemia ameliorated postischemic AKI [29], but two other studies found no renoprotection when the PHD inhibitor was given 1 min prior to reperfusion [18] or at days 2 and 4 post-IRI [15]. Therefore, for potential clinical translation of PHD inhibition in AKI, careful investigation of the factors determining the therapeutic window is needed; timing, dosing, and potency of inhibition against specific PHD isoforms may have critical roles in dictating outcomes.

Table 1:

Summary of in vivo studies examining the role of PHD/HIF axis in acute kidney injury.

AKI model Experimental Approach AKI outcome Ref.
IRI (rats) Cobalt chloride induced PHD inhibition before IRI Kidney injury ↓ [14]
IRI (rats) Carbon monoxide induced systemic hypoxia or FG-4487 induced PHD inhibition before IRI Kidney injury ↓ [15]
IRI (mice) DMOG/L-mimosine induced PHD inhibition before IRI→
Genetic inactivation of HIF-1α: IRI in Hif1a+/− mice→
Genetic inactivation of HIF-2α: IRI in Hif2a+/− mice →
Kidney injury ↓
Kidney injury ↑
Kidney injury ↑
[16]
IRI (mice) GSK1002083A induced PHD inhibition before IRI →
GSK1002083A induced PHD inhibition after IRI →
Kidney injury ↓
No effect
[17]
IRI (rats) ICA induced PHD inhibition before IRI →
ICA induced PHD inhibition after IRI →
Kidney injury ↓
No effect
[18]
IRI (mice) Inducible genetic inactivation of Vhl one week before IRI: HIF-1α ↑, HIF-2α ↑ Kidney injury ↓ [19]
IRI (mice) Xenon induced HIF-1α before IRI Kidney injury ↓ [20]
IRI (mice) Nanoparticle targeted delivery of Phd2 siRNA in kidney before IRI Kidney injury ↓ [21]
IRI (mice) Vhl inactivation in thick ascending limb: HIF-1α ↑ Kidney injury ↓ [22]
IRI (rats) TRC160334 induced PHD inhibition before IRI →
TRC160334 induced PHD inhibition after IRI →
Kidney injury ↓
Kidney injury ↓
[29]
IRI (mice) Genetic inactivation of HIF-2α: IRI in Hif2akd mice →
Genetic restoration of EC- HIF-2α in Hif2akd mice →
Kidney injury ↑
Kidney injury ↓
[30]
IRI (mice) EC- Hif1a−/−
EC- Hif2a−/−
EC- Hif1aHif2a−/−
No effect
Kidney injury ↑
Kidney injury ↑
[7]
IRI (mice) EC-Phd2−/−
EC-Phd2Hif1a−/−
EC-Phd2Hif2a−/−
Kidney injury ↓
No effect
Kidney injury ↓
[32]
Cisplatin induced AKI (rats) Cobalt chloride induced PHD inhibition before AKI Kidney injury ↓ [23]
Cisplatin induced AKI (rats) Carbon monoxide induced systemic hypoxia before AKI Kidney injury ↓ [24]
Allogenic kidney transplant (rats) FG-4497 induced PHD inhibition in donors: HIF-1α ↑, HIF-2α ↑ Improved graft function
Early mortality ↓
Long-term survival ↑
[25]
Gentamicin induced AKI (rats) Cobalt induced PHD inhibition along with gentamicin induced AKI Kidney injury ↓ [26]
Sepsis induced AKI (mice) 3,4-dihydroxybenzoate induced PHD inhibition before sepsis Kidney injury ↓ [28]
Rhabdomyolysis induced AKI (mice) Inducible genetic inactivation of Vhl in renal tubules before rhabdomyolysis induced AKI Kidney injury ↓ [27]

Abbreviation: DMOG, Dimethyloxallyl glycine; ICA, 2-(1-chloro-4-hydroxyisoquinoline-3-carboxamido) acetate; EC, endothelial cell.

The role of endothelial hypoxic signaling in acute kidney injury

Among the different cellular compartments explored as sources for HIF-induced cytoprotection, the endothelium has received particular attention because restoration of HIF-2α expression specifically in endothelial cells was sufficient to reverse the susceptibility to IRI due to systemic HIF-2α knockdown [30]. Remarkably, inactivation of endothelial HIF-2α, but not endothelial HIF-1α, impaired recovery after kidney IRI leading to increased tubulointerstitial injury, peritubular capillary rarefaction, and inflammation [7, 31]. Treatment with inhibitory monoclonal antibodies against VCAM1 and its ligand very late antigen-4 (VLA4) reversed renal injury associated with endothelial HIF-2α deletion suggesting a critical role for endothelial HIF-VCAM1 axis in regulating postischemic kidney injury [7]. To investigate the role of the endothelial PHD2/HIF axis in postischemic kidney injury, we inactivated PHD2 individually or concurrently with either HIF-1α or HIF-2α by Cre-loxP–mediated recombination [32]. Mice lacking endothelial PHD2 demonstrated improved early and late outcomes following ischemic kidney injury with preserved kidney function and reduced fibrotic response. Furthermore, we examined the contribution of HIF signaling cascade in renoprotection due to endothelial PHD2 inactivation by generating mice concomitantly deficient for either PHD2 and HIF-1α (EC-Phd2Hif1) or PHD2 and HIF-2α (EC-Phd2Hif2) in endothelium. Using this genetic approach, we found that PHD2 activity in endothelial cells regulates postischemic renal IRI in a manner dependent on HIF-1α, but not HIF-2α. Furthermore, we found that the endothelial PHD2/HIF-1 axis attenuated postischemic leukocyte recruitment by regulating endothelial adhesion molecules and chemotactic factors. Surprisingly, there was no evidence of HIF stabilization in the kidneys of mice lacking endothelial PHD2 at baseline conditions and following IRI, an observation which indicates decreased responsiveness of the kidney endothelium to PHD2 deficiency. Interestingly, differential expression analysis of the three Phd isoforms in mouse kidney tissues subjected to single-cell RNA sequencing demonstrated low expression for Phd2 and Phd3 in kidney endothelial cells, whereas Phd1 showed the highest expression. Given the lack of detectable HIF-1α activation in the kidneys of mutant mice deficient for endothelial PHD2, we hypothesized that extrarenal PHD2-responsive vascular beds may generate HIF-1α–dependent anti-inflammatory signals through the release of a humoral factor. To test this hypothesis, we examined whether serum isolated from EC-Phd2Hif2, EC-Phd2Hif1 mutants and their controls modulates the proinflammatory responses of endothelial cells exposed to hypoxia/reoxygenation (H/R) and TNFα. Notably, serum from mice lacking both EC-PHD2 and HIF-2α but not HIF-1α was sufficient to suppress the induction of interferon regulatory factor 1 (IRF1) and VCAM1 mRNA levels by H/R and TNFα treatment [32]. Interestingly, humoral factors have also been implicated in the hyperactive angiogenesis induced by PHD2 inhibition even in organs with inefficient PHD2 disruption [9].

Clinical studies

Activation of hypoxia signaling has been implicated in mediating remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC), in which ischemia to one organ protects distant organs. While prior randomized trials have shown renal protection [33, 34] when RIPC was applied, two recent multicenter, randomized trials, the Remote Ischemic Preconditioning for Heart Surgery (RIPHeart) Study [35] and the Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery (ERICCA) trial) [36], found no renoprotection by RIPC in patients who underwent cardiac surgery. Both negative trials used propofol as primary anesthetic agent, which has been shown to inhibit HIF activity, an action that could blunt the effects of preconditioning [37]. In fact, a meta-analysis of randomized trials showed that propofol-based anesthesia, as compared with halogenated agents, doubled mortality among patients who underwent cardiac surgery [38]. Furthermore, it is likely that common comorbidities in patients included in these trials such as diabetes and old age may interfere with the response to preconditioning.

PHD inhibitors activate HIF and late-stage clinical trials have established their efficacy in stimulating erythropoiesis in patients with renal anemia. Beyond erythropoiesis, the use of PHD inhibitors against human AKI remains unexplored. At the time of writing this review, a phase II clinical trial (NCT01920594) using the PHD inhibitor GSK1278863 found no reduction of ischemic complications in patients undergoing thoracic aortic aneurysm repair. Given the promise of PHD inhibitors as cytoprotective agents in AKI, intense clinical investigation is anticipated in this field. In this regard, the challenges in translating RIPC to humans should inform the design of AKI trials using PHD inhibitors, with particular emphasis on factors such as the patient populations included, comorbidities, and concomitant medications.

Conclusion and future directions

Recent studies elucidated a critical role for endothelial derived PHD/HIF signaling in regulating postischemic kidney injury and inflammation with potential implications that extend to other ischemic injuries. Under PHD competent conditions, endothelial HIF-2α appears to be the major regulator of postischemic AKI outcomes, whereas in the context of endothelial PHD2 deficiency, HIF-1α drives the renoprotective and anti-inflammatory effects against postischemic AKI (Figure 1). Nevertheless, the role of different endothelial PHD isoforms in the pathophysiology of AKI is not well defined and warrants further investigation. With the first generation of PHD inhibitors being in late-phase clinical trials for patients with renal anemia, O2 sensing-based cytoprotective therapies exhibit a promising potential against ischemic AKI. Because activation of HIF signaling has several adverse effects including pulmonary hypertension, tumor progression and angiogenesis, understanding of its context-specific pathophysiological function is needed for the successful translation to therapies.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Schematic depicting the role of endothelial hypoxic signaling in postischemic kidney injury. Under endothelial PHD2-competent conditions, endothelial HIF-2 regulates IRI-induced kidney injury and inflammation by a mechanism that involves suppression of VCAM1. On the other hand, in the context of endothelial PHD2 inactivation, endothelial HIF-1 signaling probably derived from an extrarenal vascular bed generates renoprotective and anti-inflammatory effects through the release of humoral factors. WT, wild type; EC, endothelial cell; PHI, PHD inhibitor; 2OG, 2-oxoglutarate.

Funding

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grant R01DK115850 (to PPK).

Abbreviation:

DMOG

Dimethyloxallyl glycine

ICA

2-(1-chloro-4-hydroxyisoquinoline-3-carboxamido) acetate

EC

endothelial cell

Footnotes

Disclosure Statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  • 1.Majmundar AJ, Wong WJ, Simon MC. Hypoxia-Inducible Factors and the Response to Hypoxic Stress. Mol Cell. 2010;40(2):294–309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kaelin WG, Ratcliffe PJ. Oxygen sensing by metazoans: the central role of the HIF hydroxylase pathway. Mol Cell. 2008;30(4):393–402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Smith TG, Brooks JT, Balanos GM, Lappin TR, Layton DM, Leedham DL, et al. Mutation of von Hippel-Lindau tumour suppressor and human cardiopulmonary physiology. PLoS Med. 2006. Jul;3(7):e290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Krock BL, Skuli N, Simon MC. Hypoxia-induced angiogenesis: good and evil. Genes Cancer. 2011. Dec;2(12):1117–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yim SH, Shah Y, Tomita S, Morris HD, Gavrilova O, Lambert G, et al. Disruption of the Arnt gene in endothelial cells causes hepatic vascular defects and partial embryonic lethality in mice. Hepatology. 2006;44(3):550–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Licht AH, Müller-Holtkamp F, Flamme I, Breier G. Inhibition of hypoxia-inducible factor activity in endothelial cells disrupts embryonic cardiovascular development. Blood. 2006;107(2):584–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kapitsinou PP, Sano H, Michael M, Kobayashi H, Davidoff O, Bian A, et al. Endothelial HIF-2 mediates protection and recovery from ischemic kidney injury. J Clin Invest. 2014. Jun;124(6):2396–409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Takeda K, Ho VC, Takeda H, Duan LJ, Nagy A, Fong GH. Placental but not heart defects are associated with elevated hypoxia-inducible factor alpha levels in mice lacking prolyl hydroxylase domain protein 2. Mol Cell Biol. 2006. Nov;26(22):8336–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Takeda K, Cowan A, Fong G-H. Essential Role for Prolyl Hydroxylase Domain Protein 2 in Oxygen Homeostasis of the Adult Vascular System. Circulation. 2007;116(7):774–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kapitsinou PP, Rajendran G, Astleford L, Michael M, Schonfeld MP, Fields T, et al. The Endothelial Prolyl-4-Hydroxylase Domain 2/Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 2 Axis Regulates Pulmonary Artery Pressure in Mice. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2016;36(10):1584–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lübbers DW, Baumgärtl H. Heterogeneities and profiles of oxygen pressure in brain and kidney as examples of the pO2 distribution in the living tissue. Kidney Int. 1997. Feb;51(2):372–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Evans RG, Gardiner BS, Smith DW, O'Connor PM. Intrarenal oxygenation: unique challenges and the biophysical basis of homeostasis. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2008. 2008/11/01;295(5):F1259–F70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rosenberger C, Mandriota S, Jürgensen JS, Wiesener MS, Hörstrup JH, Frei U, et al. Expression of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α and -2α in Hypoxic and Ischemic Rat Kidneys. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2002;13(7):1721–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Matsumoto M, Makino Y, Tanaka T, Tanaka H, Ishizaka N, Noiri E, et al. Induction of renoprotective gene expression by cobalt ameliorates ischemic injury of the kidney in rats. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003. Jul;14(7):1825–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bernhardt WM, Campean V, Kany S, Jurgensen JS, Weidemann A, Warnecke C, et al. Preconditional activation of hypoxia-inducible factors ameliorates ischemic acute renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006. Jul;17(7):1970–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hill P, Shukla D, Tran MG, Aragones J, Cook HT, Carmeliet P, et al. Inhibition of hypoxia inducible factor hydroxylases protects against renal ischemia-reperfusion injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;19(1):39–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kapitsinou PP, Jaffe J, Michael M, Swan CE, Duffy KJ, Erickson-Miller CL, et al. Preischemic targeting of HIF prolyl hydroxylation inhibits fibrosis associated with acute kidney injury. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2012. May 1;302(9):F1172–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wang Z, Schley G, Turkoglu G, Burzlaff N, Amann KU, Willam C, et al. The protective effect of prolyl-hydroxylase inhibition against renal ischaemia requires application prior to ischaemia but is superior to EPO treatment. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012. Mar;27(3):929–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Iguchi M, Kakinuma Y, Kurabayashi A, Sato T, Shuin T, Hong SB, et al. Acute inactivation of the VHL gene contributes to protective effects of ischemic preconditioning in the mouse kidney. Nephron Exp Nephrol. 2008;110(3):e82–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ma D, Lim T, Xu J, Tang H, Wan Y, Zhao H, et al. Xenon preconditioning protects against renal ischemic-reperfusion injury via HIF-1alpha activation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009. Apr;20(4):713–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Xie D, Wang J, Hu G, Chen C, Yang H, Ritter JK, et al. Kidney-targeted delivery of PHD2 siRNA with nanoparticles alleviated renal ischemia/reperfusion injury. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2021. Jun 8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Schley G, Klanke B, Schodel J, Forstreuter F, Shukla D, Kurtz A, et al. Hypoxia-inducible transcription factors stabilization in the thick ascending limb protects against ischemic acute kidney injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011. Nov;22(11):2004–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tanaka T, Kojima I, Ohse T, Inagi R, Miyata T, Ingelfinger JR, et al. Hypoxia-inducible factor modulates tubular cell survival in cisplatin nephrotoxicity. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2005. Nov;289(5):F1123–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Weidemann A, Bernhardt WM, Klanke B, Daniel C, Buchholz B, Campean V, et al. HIF activation protects from acute kidney injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008. Mar;19(3):486–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bernhardt WM, Gottmann U, Doyon F, Buchholz B, Campean V, Schodel J, et al. Donor treatment with a PHD-inhibitor activating HIFs prevents graft injury and prolongs survival in an allogenic kidney transplant model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009. Dec 15;106(50):21276–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ahn JM, You SJ, Lee YM, Oh SW, Ahn SY, Kim S, et al. Hypoxia-inducible factor activation protects the kidney from gentamicin-induced acute injury. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fahling M, Mathia S, Paliege A, Koesters R, Mrowka R, Peters H, et al. Tubular von Hippel-Lindau knockout protects against rhabdomyolysis-induced AKI. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013. Nov;24(11):1806–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Schindler K, Bondeva T, Schindler C, Claus RA, Franke S, Wolf G. Preconditioned suppression of prolyl-hydroxylases attenuates renal injury but increases mortality in septic murine models. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2016. Jul;31(7):1100–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Jamadarkhana P, Chaudhary A, Chhipa L, Dubey A, Mohanan A, Gupta R, et al. Treatment with a novel hypoxia-inducible factor hydroxylase inhibitor (TRC160334) ameliorates ischemic acute kidney injury. Am J Nephrol. 2012;36(3):208–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kojima I, Tanaka T, Inagi R, Kato H, Yamashita T, Sakiyama A, et al. Protective role of hypoxia-inducible factor-2alpha against ischemic damage and oxidative stress in the kidney. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007. Apr;18(4):1218–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kalucka J, Schley G, Georgescu A, Klanke B, Rössler S, Baumgartl J, et al. Kidney injury is independent of endothelial HIF-1α. J Mol Med (Berl). 2015;93(8):891–904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rajendran G, Schonfeld MP, Tiwari R, Huang S, Torosyan R, Fields T, et al. Inhibition of Endothelial PHD2 Suppresses Post-Ischemic Kidney Inflammation through Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020. Mar;31(3):501–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zarbock A, Schmidt C, Van Aken H, Wempe C, Martens S, Zahn PK, et al. Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Kidney Injury Among High-Risk Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015;313(21):2133–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Liu Z, Zhao Y, Lei M, Zhao G, Li D, Sun R, et al. Remote Ischemic Preconditioning to Prevent Acute Kidney Injury After Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8:601470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hausenloy DJ, Candilio L, Evans R, Ariti C, Jenkins DP, Kolvekar S, et al. Remote Ischemic Preconditioning and Outcomes of Cardiac Surgery. New Engl J Med. 2015. 2015/10/08;373(15):1408–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Meybohm P, Bein B, Brosteanu O, Cremer J, Gruenewald M, Stoppe C, et al. A Multicenter Trial of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning for Heart Surgery. New Engl J Med. 2015. 2015/10/08;373(15):1397–407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Takabuchi S, Hirota K, Nishi K, Oda S, Oda T, Shingu K, et al. The intravenous anesthetic propofol inhibits hypoxia-inducible factor 1 activity in an oxygen tension-dependent manner. FEBS Letters. 2004. 2004/11/19;577(3):434–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Landoni G, Greco T, Biondi-Zoccai G, Nigro Neto C, Febres D, Pintaudi M, et al. Anaesthetic drugs and survival: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized trials in cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2013. 2013/12/01/;111(6):886–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES