Table 1.
Protocol name | Biological hypothesis underlying clinical effects | Reported clinical outcomes | |
---|---|---|---|
Principle | |||
Ex-vivo T-cell depletionTCD platforms |
CD34+ megadose
Positive CD34+ selection |
Use of G-CSF mobilized PBSC as graft source allows the collection of high numbers of stem cells that are isolated using immune magnetic strategies. |
|
Slow immune reconstitution leads to high incidence of infection and high relapse rates | |||
Specific alloreactive T-cell depletion
⇔ Selective CD3+/CD19+ cell depletion |
NK cells, monocytes and dendritic cells are retained, which may contribute to a better immune reconstitution after transplantation |
|
|
Significantly increase of the risk of GVHD compared with positive CD34+ selection | |||
Designed graft
⇔ Specific removal of alloreactive cells |
Depletion of TCRαβ+/CD19+ cells/depletion of CD45RA+ naive T cells |
|
|
Low incidence of GVHD and NRM, excellent relapse-free survival | |||
Adoptive T-cell add-back | – Donor-derived Tregs decrease aGVHD |
|
|
⇔ Treg/Tcons infusion following haplo-HSCT | – Co-infusion of Treg + conventional T cells fosters immune reconstitution and prevents aGVHD | ||
→ Low incidence of GVHD, optimal immune reconstitution, and very low relapse rate | |||
Genetically engineered TK cells add-back | TK-cell infusions would confer GVL activity and early protective immune reconstitution after haplo-HSCT, while the suicide gene allow the control of GVHD which could be induced by the TK-cells | 3y NRM 40% for patients with de-novo AML in CR at haplo-HSCT/41% for patients in relapse at haplo-HSCT 3y OS: 49% for patients with de-novo leukemias in any CR No GVHD-related deaths or long-term complication (10 of 22 immune reconstituted patients developed aGVHD + 1 patient developed cGVHD) |
|
⇔ Infusion of donor lymphocytes expressing herpes-simplex thymidine kinase suicide gene (TK-cells) following haplo-HSCT (14) | |||
In-vivo T-cell depletion TCR platforms | Baltimore protocol | High-dose PT-Cy | Non-myeloablative conditioning |
T-cell replete (TCR), unmanipulated graft + High doses PT-Cy: 50 mg/kg/day on day +3/+4 | – Selectively eliminates the alloreactive donor T cells (mainly naive T cells) without exerting toxic effects on hematopoietic stem cells |
|
|
↘ Proliferation of alloreactive CD4+ effector T cells | Myeloablative regimen | ||
↘ Survival of alloreactive CD4+ and CD8+ alloreactive T cells |
|
||
–Preferentially encourages recovery of regulatory T cells | |||
→Host regulatory T cells thereby expand shifting the Treg:T-cell ratio in favor of an immunotolerant balance | |||
Beijing protocol | G-CSF | ||
T-cell replete (TCR), unmanipulated and G-CSF primed graft + ATG + Intensive post-graft IS (MTX, CsA, MMF) |
|
|
Adapted from “Evolution of the Role of Haploidentical ´ Stem Cell Transplantation: Past, Present, and Future”, Kwon et al. (7) and “Update on Current Research Into Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation”, Sun et al. (15).
aGVHD, acute GVHD; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; ATG, anti-thymoglobulin; BM, bone marrow; cGVHD, chronic GVHD; CR(#), complete remission (number #); CsA, ciclosporin-A; DFS, disease-free survival; G-CSF, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; GVL: graft versus leukemia; IS, immunosuppression; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; MTX, methotrexate; NRM, non-relapse mortality; OS, overall survival; PBSC, peripheral blood stem cell; PFS, progression-free survival; PT-Cy, post-transplant cyclophosphamide; TCD, T-cell depleted; TCR, T-cell replete; TRM, transplant-related mortality; NMAC, non myeloablative conditioning; #y, # years.