Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 19;100(3):216–230. doi: 10.2471/BLT.21.286870

Table 1. Sample characteristics and study outcomes of research reporting the prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Sri Lanka, 2021.

Country and study (year data collected) Study area Age, years Sex Sample size COPD criteria
Prevalence of COPD based on GOLD fixed criteria, % (95% CI)
Prevalence of COPD based on the lower limit of normal criteria, %
Fixeda Lower limit of normalb Overall Male Female Overall Male Female
COPD confirmed with post-bronchodilation spirometry
Studies included in meta-analysis
Bangladesh
    Alam et al., 2015 (2011–2012)25 Rural Matlab and suburban Kamlapur ≥ 40 Male, female 3660 Yes Yes Total: 13.5 (12.4–14.6), rural: 17.0, urban: 9.9 Total: 22.0 Total: 6.4 Total: 10.3 (9.3–11.3), rural: 12.5, urban: 8.0 Total:16.2 Total: 5.3
    Biswas et al., 2016 (2010–2011)36 Rural Chittagong > 40 Female 250 Yes No NA NA 20.4 NA NA NA
    Islam et al., 2013 (2008)26 Urban Dhaka ≥ 35 Male, female 900 Yes No 11.4 11.7 10.6 NA NA NA
India
    Burney et al., 2020 (NR)24c Mumbai ≥ 40 Male, female 275 males; 165 females No Yes NA NA NA NR 6.2 7.9
Pune ≥ 40 Male, female 501 males; 341 females No Yes NA NA NA NR 5.8 6.7
Srinagar ≥ 40 Male, female 411 males; 341 females No Yes NA NA NA NR 17.3 15.5
Mysore ≥ 40 Male, female 256 males; 345 females No Yes NA NA NA NR 11.3 5.5
    Christopher et al., 2020 (2018)28 Rural Vellore ≥ 30 Male, female 787 Yes Yes 4.1 (2.7–5.5) 5.7 2.9 4.6 4.2 4.9
    Johnson et al., 2011 (2007)29 Rural Tiruvallur ≥ 30 Femaled 900 Yes No NA NA 2.4 (1.4–3.5) NA NA NA
    Koul et al., 2016 (2010–2011)21c Rural Srinagar ≥ 40 Male, female 757 Yes Yes 19.3 23.7 14.5 16.1 17.3 14.8
    Mukhmohit et al., 2014 (NR)37 Rural Ambala ≥ 35 Female 1027 Yes No NA NA 5.1 NA NA NA
    Sinha et al., 2017 (2012–2013)38 Urban Delhi ≥ 30 Male, female 1203 Yes No 10.1 (8.5–11.9) 12.2 7.7 NA NA NA
    Triest et al., 2019 (NR)22c Srinagar ≥ 40 Male, female 739 No Yes NA NA NA 16.4 NR NR
Mumbai ≥ 40 Male, female 440 No Yes NA NA NA 6.8 NR NR
Pune ≥ 40 Male, female 843 No Yes NA NA NA 6.2 NR NR
Nepal
    Adhikari et al., 2020 (2019)30 Semi-urban Pokhara ≥ 40 Male, female 1508 Yes Yes 8.5 (7.2–10.0) 10.9 (8.7–13.5) 6.4 (4.9–8.4) 5.4 (4.2–6.6) 7.6 (5.8–9.9) 3.5 (2.4–5.0)
Sri Lanka
    Triest et al., 2019 (NR)22c Colombo ≥ 40 Male, female 1020 No Yes NA NA NA 7.3 NR NR
Studies not included in meta-analysis
Bangladesh
    Grigsby et al., 2016 (2011–2012)27e Rural Matlab ≥ 40 Male, female 1846 No Yes NA NA NA 15.0 NR NR
Urban Dhaka ≥ 40 Male, female 1878 No Yes NA NA NA 10.0 NR NR
India
    Burney et al., 2014c: Mumbai (2006–2008); Pune (2008–2009); Srinagar (2010–2011)20e Mumbai ≥ 40 Male, female 440 No Yes NA NA NA NR 6.0 7.6
Pune 843 No Yes NA NA NA NR 5.7 6.8
Srinagar 763 No Yes NA NA NA NR 17.3 14.8
    Townend et al., 2017 (NR)23c,e Kashmir ≥ 40 Male, female 738 No Yes NA NA NA 16.0 NR NR
    Mahesh et al., 2018 (2014–2016)39f Rural Mysuru > 30 Male, female Phase 1: 8457, phase 2: 1085 Yes No 0.92 1.0 0.6 NA NA NA
Sri Lanka  
    Townend et al., 2017 (NR) 23c,e NR ≥ 40 Male, female 1035 No Yes NA NA NA 8.0 NR NR
COPD without confirmation with post-bronchodilation spirometry
India
    Arora et al., 2018 (2015)40 Urban Delhi 18–59 Female 299g Yes No NA NA 5.0 NA NA NA
    Chaturvedi et al., 2015 (2014–2015)41 Rural Muzaffarnagar ≥ 30 Male, female 908 Yes No 7.8 NR NR NA NA NA
    Mukherjee et al., 2014 (NR)42 Rural West Bengal 23–43 Femaleh,i 1119 Yes No NA NA 2.8 NA NA NA
    Panigrahi et al., 2018 (NR)43 Rural Khordha 18–49 Femaled,i 1120 Yes No NA NA All: 22.4
Exposed to biomass fuel smoke: 31.0
Exposed to mixed fuel smoke: 22.8
Not exposed: 7.8
NA NA NA
    Parasuramalu et al., 2014 (2008)44 Rural Bengaluru > 35 Male, female 1400 Yes No 4.4 NR NR NA NA NA
    Pathak et al., 2019 (NR)45 Rural western Uttar Pradesh > 18 Female 310 Yes No NA NA 17.42 NA NA NA
    Shanmugananth et al., 2019 (NR)46 Chennai, Surendranagar and Hisar > 30 Male, female 1000 Yes No 9.0 NR NR NA NA NA
    Sharma et al., 2016 (2016)47 Rural Jammu > 20 Male, female 2018 Peak expiratory flow rate No 4.2 5.4 2.8 NA NA NA
    Sharma et al., 2019 (2012–2013)48 Urban Ludhiana > 20 Male, female 8128 Yes No 3.2/1000 NR NR NA NA NA
Nepal
    Dhimal et al., 2019 (2016–2018)49 Nationwide ≥ 20 Male, female 13 200 Yes No 11.7 (10.5–12.9) 12.6 (11.2–14.1) 11.0 (9.6–12.4) NA NA NA
    Kurmi et al., 2013 (2006–2007)50 Rural and urban Kathmandu ≥ 16 Male, female 1392 Yes Yes NR NR NR Exposed to biomass fuel smoke: 8.1
Not exposed: 3.6
Exposed to biomass fuel smoke: 7.4
Not exposed: 3.3
Exposed to biomass fuel smoke: 10.8
Not exposed: 3.8

CI: confidence interval; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; GOLD: Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease; NA: not applicable; NR: not reported.

a Fixed criteria defined as a post-bronchodilator ratio of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) to the forced vital capacity (FVC), FEV1/FVC < 0.70.

b The lower limit of normal criteria defined as a post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC below the lower limit of normal, i.e. the lower fifth centile of values from a reference population.

c Data from the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease (BOLD) Study.

d Non-smokers.

e Because more recent or detailed data available from another study.

f Only 15% of study participants underwent spirometry.

g 500 women consented and acceptable spirometry data for 299 women were used for analysis.

h Premenopausal women.

i Involved with cooking.