Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 8;11(1):38–43. doi: 10.4103/EUS-D-21-00006

Table 2.

Hepaticogastrostomy versus choledochoduodenostomy demographics and clinical outcomes (n=182)

Characteristics HG (n=95) CCD (n=87) P
Age (years), mean (SD) 69.9 (12.7) 69.7 (12.8) 0.320102
Gender-male, n(%) 52 (55) 41 (50)
Diagnosis, n(%)
 Benign 6 (6)
Choledocholithiasis (1)
11 (13)
Choledocholithiasis (10)
0.142818
 Malignant 89 (94)
Ampullary adenocarcinoma (1)
Gallbladder cancer (5)
Cholangiocarcinoma (19)
Pancreatic cancer (42)
Colorectal cancer (6)
Others (16)
76 (87)
Ampullary adenocarcinoma (4)
Gallbladder cancer (1)
Cholangiocarcinoma (4)
Pancreatic cancer (57)
Colorectal cancer (6)
Others (4)
Indication, n(%)
 Obstructive jaundice 75 (79) 77 (89) 0.018186
 Cholangitis 25 (21) 10 (11)
Instrument for dissection
 Balloon dilator 25 26
 Needle knife 20 20
 Cystotome 55 21
 Cautery tipped - 9
Stent type
 Plastic (7 or 10 French diameter) 8 15 0.086553
 Metal (8-or 10-mm diameter) 82 70
  LAMS 0 25
  FCSEMS 61 45
  Partially covered or uncovered 21 0
Technical success, n(%) 87/95 (92) 80/87 (92)
Clinical success, n(%) 25/87 (71) 8/80 (90) 0.010
Adverse events, n(%) 20 (21) 26 (30) 0.170817
 Biloma 1 -
 Cholangitis 2 1
 Bleeding 6 3
 Peritonitis 1 -
 Perforation 2 2
 Migration 1 1
 Infection 2 3
 Other 5 10
Successful management of obstruction, n(%) 75/87 (86) 80/80 (100)
Total follow up duration (months) 6 5.6 0.422554
Total endoscopic sessions (range) 1.9 (1-13) 1.22 (1-3) 0.0043

LAMS: Lumen-apposing metal stent; FCEMS: Fully-covered self-expanding metal stent; SD: Standard deviation; CCD: Choledochoduodenostomy; HG: Hepaticogastrostomy