Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 15;50(4):2363–2376. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac096

Table 2.

Thermodynamic parameters from ITC experiments between Cas8e and AcrIE4-F7 mutantsa

AcrIE4-F7 Cas8e K D (nM) N ΔG (kcal/mol) ΔH (kcal/mol) TΔS (kcal/mol)
WT WT 200 ± 28 1.0 ± 0.0 −9.2 ± 0.1 −14.7 ± 1.4 5.5 ± 1.5
E12K/D13K WT 400 ± 120 0.8 ± 0.0 −8.8 ± 0.2 −22.8 ± 1.8 14.0 ± 1.9
E19K/D22K WT N.B.b - - - -
E19K WT N.B. - - - -
D22K WT N.B. - - - -
Y20A WT 3500 ± 1300 1.1 ± 0.2 −7.6 ± 0.3 −5.6 ± 1.5 −2.0 ± 1.5
D30K/E31K WT 4800 ± 690 0.8 ± 0.1 −7.3 ± 0.1 −11.1 ± 1.8 3.8 ± 1.7
E38K/D39K WT 190 ± 15 0.9 ± 0.1 −9.2 ± 0.0 −12.8 ± 2.2 3.6 ± 2.2
E46K WT 430 ± 30 1.0 ± 0.1 −8.7 ± 0.0 −11.7 ± 1.5 3.0 ± 1.5
AcrIE4-F7NTD WT 140 ± 40 0.8 ± 0.1 −9.4 ± 0.2 −18.1 ± 1.7 8.7 ± 1.5

aITC experiments were performed in triplicate, and their thermodynamic parameters are reported as average values with standard errors.

bNo binding: Integrated heats from the measurement were insufficient to constrain the least squares fit derived from a single-site binding model for the titration.