Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 18;24(4):503–510. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntab216

Table 2.

Logistic Regression Results for Four Areas of Tobacco Demand Reduction Measures

Taxes (2018) Smoking bans (2019): pubs Smoking bans (2019):
indoor offices
Health warning labels (2019) TAPS (2019): sponsorship TAPS (2019):
point-of-sale
Estimate
[95% CI]
p Estimate
[95% CI]
p Estimate
[95% CI]
p Estimate
[95% CI]
p Estimate
[95% CI]
p Estimate
[95% CI]
p
Time since FCTC ratification 0.89
[0.78–1.01]
.069 1.13 [1.03–1.27] .015 1.13 [1.03–1.26] .013 1.17 [1.06–1.31] .002 1.10 [0.99–1.23] .090 1.08 [0.99–1.19] .096
50% tax rate (1999) 3.53
[1.06–13.10]
.047
Smoking restrictions (1997) 1.35 [0.47–3.87] .576 1.04 [0.50–2.14] .924
FCTC compliant HWLs (1997) 5.32 [0.86–103.9] .132
TAP restrictions (1997) 1.15 [0.47–2.74] 0.755 0.92 [0.42–2.02] .835
WB income group
1 Low-income Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref
2 Lower middle-income 0.88
[0.08–20.93]
.919 0.48 [0.16–1.41] .185 1.17 [0.40–3.41] .774 3.75 [1.16–13.70] .033 0.29 [0.09–0.89] .034 0.92 [0.30–2.79] .883
3 Higher middle- income 5.38
[0.46–144.04]
.221 1.40 [0.45–4.46] .561 1.57 [0.47–5.30] .460 3.14 [0.83–13.07] .099 0.35 [0.10–1.24] .107 0.66 [0.19–2.28] .510
4 High-income 2.53
[0.08–130.31]
.641 0.56 [0.10–2.94] .498 0.64 [0.11–3.48] .608 2.46 [0.38–16.98) .349 0.29 [0.04–1.81] .194 2.36 [0.39–15.09] .353
State capacity 1.01 [0.96–1.06] .803 1.00 [0.98–1.03] .991 1.00 [0.97–1.02] .714 0.96 [0.93–0.99] .018 0.99 [0.96–1.02] .451 1.02 [1.00–1.05] .071

Statistically significant estimates (p<0.05) are presented in bold. Almost statistically significant estimates (p < 0.10) are italicized.