Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 14;10(2):e26275. doi: 10.2196/26275

Table 1.

Main characteristics and findings of 6 meta-analyses.

Source Study design Age, year Sample size (P/Ea) Mobile device type App name App
description
TDb Main results
Nik Azis et al [21], Malaysia Cross-sectional study 5-6 195/290 iPad mini AAPOSc Vision Screening Lea symbols chart 3 m Sensitivity: 82.1% (right vision), 82.1% (left vision); Specificity: 81.3% (right vision), 76.9% (left vision)
Rono et al [17], Kenyan Population-based study 11.5, 11.7 Sd:10,284/S:20,568, Pe:10,579/P:21,158 Samsung Galaxy S3 Peek Acuity Tumbling E chart 2 m Sensitivity: 76.9% (64.8%-86.5%), Specificity: 90.8% (89.3%-92.1%)
Zhao et al [22], US Prospective study 3-17 106/212 Samsung Galaxy S3 SGH-i747 Peek Acuity Tumbling E chart 2 m Sensitivity: 83%-86% for decreased vision, Sensitivity: 69%-83% for referable ocular disease
de Venecia et al [20], US Observational study 6-17 393/190 Samsung Galaxy A3 Peek Acuity Tumbling E chart 2 m Sensitivity: 48%, Specificity: 83%
Bastawrous et al [13], UK Population-based study 55-97 233/466 Galaxy S3 GT-I9300 Peek Acuity Tumbling E chart 2 m Sensitivity: 84.6% (95% CI 54.5%-97.6%); Specificity: 97.7% (95% CI 94.8%-99.3%)
Andersen et al [19], Botswana Population-based study 6-22 12,877/– Android phones Peek Vision Tumbling E chart 2 m Sensitivity: 91.6%; Specificity: 90.7%

aP/E: participant/eye.

bTD: test distance.

cAAPOS: American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.

dS: standard group.

eP: peek group.