Table 10.

Reported results from standardized questionnaires, surveys, and interviews (N=18).

Evaluation method	Reported outcomes	References
Standardized questionnaire	Mean SUSa score of at least 73.0 across 5 studies (range 73.0-87.5). PSSUQb score of 1.7 (SD 0.5). All tasks rated median SEQc score of 1 (very easy) or 2 (easy).	[23,24,26,33,38]
Survey	Respondents had favorable responses to the dashboards (range 72-79). Respondents stated the data were actionable (range 48-69). Respondents felt the data improve their practice (range 64-98).	[28,29,31,35]
Interview	Interviewees were interested and enthusiastic about the individual patient dashboard. Interviewees were generally excited to have the opportunity to see the cohort dashboard but commented on its complexity. Interviewees were generally positive about the clinical performance summary, patient lists, suggested actions, and detailed patient-level information views. Interviewees identified improvements on the clinical performance summaries view (eg, inclusion of CIs with differing guidance was confusing).	[33,38]

^aSUS: system usability scale.

^bPSSUQ: Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire.

^cSEQ: single ease question.