Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 22;2022:2213273. doi: 10.1155/2022/2213273

Table 7.

Comparison of compression savings for different compression pipelines on LeNet-300-100.

Method Original Compressed CR
Existing
STD (pruning) + k-means clustering (weight sharing) + Huffman coding [1]
305388 80904 3.77
Proposed
 Method 1
STD (pruning) + DBSCAN (weight sharing) + Huffman coding
335340 228360 1.47
 Method 2
z-score (pruning) + k-means clustering (weight sharing) + Huffman coding
422268 101991 4.14
 Method 3
z-score (pruning) + DBSCAN (weight sharing) + Huffman coding
422268 98660 4.28