Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 18;6(2):321–330. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.11.010

Table III.

Corticosteroids compared to control for health problem and/or population.

Certainty assessment
Number of patients
Effect
Certainty
Number of studies Study design Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other considerations Corticosteroids Control Relative (95% CI) Absolute (95% CI)
Pain (follow-up: range 2 months to 12 months)
 7 randomised trials serious,, serious§ not serious not serious None 258 258 - MD 0.7 VAS higher (0.22 higher to 1.18 higher) ⊕⊕◯◯
Low
Function (follow-up: range 2 months to 12 months)
 5 randomised trials serious,, not serious not serious not serious None 211 208 - SMD 0.19 SD lower (0.4 lower to 0.22 higher) ⊕⊕⊕◯
Moderate

CI, confidence interval; MD, mean difference; VAS, visual analog scale; SMD, standardized mean difference.

In one study, it was unclear whether treatment allocation was truly random.

blinding of participants did not occur in two studies.

blinding of outcome assessments not done with two studies.

§

I2 value = 56%.