Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 18;6(2):321–330. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.11.010

Table IV.

PRP compared to no active treatment for tennis elbow.

Certainty assessment
Number of patients
Effect
Certainty
Number of studies Study design Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other considerations PRP No active treatment Relative (95% CI) Absolute (95% CI)
Pain
 1 randomised trials not serious not serious not serious not serious none 46 49 - MD 0.3 VAS lower (7.27 lower to 6.67 higher) ⊕⊕⊕⊕
High
Function
 2 randomised trials not serious not serious not serious not serious none 32 32 - MD 0.31 VAS higher (0.19 lower to 0.8 higher) ⊕⊕⊕⊕
High

PRP, platelet-rich plasma; CI, confidence interval; MD, mean difference; VAS, visual analog scale.