Table 3.
Comparison between measurements and muscle masses calculated from the 3D models for the gorilla.
| Measured mass (kg) | Modelled volume (cm3) | Modelled mass (kg) | Difference (%) | LoA length (cm) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M. deltoideus clavicularis | 0.063 | 65.405 | 0.069 | 9.576 | 25.434 |
| M. deltoideus acromialis | 0.166 | 140.047 | 0.148 | − 10.669 | 21.325 |
| M. deltoideus spinalis | 0.057 | 51.387 | 0.054 | − 4.001 | 19.733* |
| M. deltoideus (combined) | 0.286 | 256.839 | 0.272 | − 4.871 | – |
| M. supraspinatus | 0.084 | 79.440 | 0.084 | 0.305 | 15.539 |
| M. infraspinatus | 0.105 | 99.730 | 0.106 | 0.843 | 15.747 |
| Total | 0.475 | 436.008 | 0.462 | − 2.695 | – |
The length of the muscle was measured along the LoA (arc length) of the modelled muscles and represents the length from origin to insertion and thus the total length of the muscle tendon unit (MTU).
*Note the length of the M. deltoideus spinalis was exaggerated due to the kink in the LoA estimation (see Fig. 3d).