Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 16;9:815156. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.815156

Table 1.

Pooled prevalence of functional constipation according to the criteria used to define its occurrence, year of study, method of questionnaire administration, validation status of questionnaire, methods of sampling, and research based on disease types.

Number of studies Number of participants Pooled prevalence (95% confidence interval) I2 p-value for χ2
CRITERIA USED TO DEFINE ITS PRESENCE
Rome I NA NA NA - -
Rome II 20 77,140 10.6% (7.2–15.4) 100% 0
Rome III 18 41,315 6.5% (3.4–12.0) 100% 0
Rome IV 1 5,624 8.1% (5.6–11.8) 97% <0.01
STUDY YEAR
Between 1991 and 2000 4 8,677 5.5% (3.6–8.2) 97% <0.01
Between 2001 and 2010 20 89,310 8.5% (5.7–12.4) 100% 0
Between 2011 and 2020 12 23,130 10.9% (5.5–20.4) 99% 0
METHOD OF QUESTIONNAIRE ADMINISTRATION
Interview-administered questionnaire 27 68,996 7.3% (4.6–11.3) 99% 0
Self-administered questionnaire 5 43,296 11.9% (6.3–21.5) 100% 0
Unclear administered questionnaire 8 11,787 11.0% (5.5–20.7) 99% <0.01
VALIDATION STATUS OF QUESTIONNAIRE
Validated 3 24,984 8.6% (6.0–12.3) 99% <0.01
Not validated 36 99,095 8.4% (5.7–12.2) 100% 0
SAMPLING METHODS
Stratify and random sampling 15 76,740 6.7% (4.8–9.2) 99% 0
Random sampling only 12 22,473 13.1% (7.2–22.5) 99% 0
Convenience sampling 12 24,866 7.2% (3.1–15.5) 99% 0
DISEASE TYPES OF RESEARCH
Constipation only 27 75,452 12.1% (8.4–17.1) 100% 0
Constipation and other gastrointestinal disorders 12 48,627 3.9% (2.2–6.7) 97% <0.01

NA, not applicable.