Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 16;9:815156. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.815156

Table 2.

Pooled prevalence of functional constipation according to the geographic regions in China.

Geographic regions Province Number of studies Number of participants Pooled prevalence (95% confidence interval) I2 p-value for χ2
North China Beijing Municipality 4 22,458 8.6% (3.5–19.6) 100% <0.01
Hebei Province 4 5,751 22.0% (10.8–39.6) 99% <0.01
Northeast China Jilin Province 1 243 38.7% (32.8–45.0) NA NA
Northwest China Shaanxi Province 2 16,798 1.4% (0.1–11.9) 95% <0.01
Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region 2 794 29.0% (22.6–36.3) 95% <0.01
Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region 1 541 38.8% (34.8–43.0) NA NA
East China Shanghai Province 6 30,477 5.6% (3.9–8.0) 97% <0.01
Zhejiang Province 4 6,690 11.0% (5.1–21.8) 99% <0.01
Anhui Province 2 6,589 4.0% (3.5–4.5) 2% 0.31
Jiangsu Province 1 1,999 3.9% (3.1–4.8) NA NA
South Central China Guangdong Province 4 24,248 5.5% (3.7–8.1) 97% <0.01
Henan Province 2 8,816 1.1% (0.2–6.1) 98% <0.01
Hubei Province 1 16,078 5.9% (5.5–6.3) NA NA
Southwest China Chongqing Municipality 1 1,492 3.2% (2.4–4.2) NA NA
Sichuan Province 1 4,967 7.4% (6.7–8.1) NA NA
Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan regions of China Taiwan 2 6,293 6.3% (4.1–9.5) 97% <0.01
Hong Kong 1 3,282 14.0% (12.8–15.2) NA NA

NA, not applicable, too few studies to assess heterogeneity.