Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 21;11:e15. doi: 10.1017/jns.2022.9

Table 2.

Dietary intake (g, unless otherwise indicated) of IBS participants and healthy controls at baseline and across each intervention period

Resistant starch 2 Sugarcane bagasse Fibre combination P value
Baseline Low Mod High Low Mod High Low Mod High
IBS participants
Energy, MJ 7⋅3 (5⋅3−8⋅4) 7⋅4 (6⋅2−8⋅3) 6⋅6 (4⋅4−8⋅4) 7⋅3 (5⋅9−7⋅8) 7⋅7 (4⋅3−8⋅8) 5⋅8 (4⋅2−9⋅1) 8⋅1 (5⋅9−9⋅9) 6⋅8 (4⋅6−7⋅9) 6⋅4 (5⋅5−8⋅1) 6⋅4 (5⋅5−8⋅9) 0⋅220
Protein 72 (60−125) 72 (55−137) 65 (51−116) 77 (33−94) 62 (38−110) 55 (23−134) 80 (62−113) 60 (42−109) 66 (46−119) 73 (26−126) 0⋅434
Fat 86 (57−138) 73 (45−91) 45 (25−71) 57 (50−75) 79 (14−112) 44 (13−76) 70 (44−119) 57 (38−69) 72 (37−98) 61 (48−82) 0⋅006
Carbohydrate 127 (93−204) 167 (145−242) 184 (148−231) 195 (180−218) 179 (167−204) 175 (162−250) 183 (130−278) 184 (133−212) 147 (128−182) 175 (131−196) 0⋅136
Fibrea 23 (16−36) 21 (16−28) 16 (10−32) 22 (13−30) 22 (19−34) 23 (17−46) 39 (24−42) 26 (20−36) 27 (24−36) 34 (25−41) 0⋅001
Resistant starcha 1 (0−2) 12 (11− 13) 16 (10−18) 22 (21−23) 3 (2−9) 3 (2−5) 3 (2−5) 15 (11−15) 16 (15−16) 19 (16−21) <0⋅001
Healthy controls
Energy, MJ 9⋅6 (8⋅2−11⋅5) 9⋅0 (7⋅4−11⋅4) 8⋅7 (4⋅6−13⋅8) 9⋅9 (7⋅0−11⋅9) 8⋅7 (5⋅3−9⋅1) 9⋅6 (8⋅3−10⋅5) 9⋅5 (5⋅8−11⋅1) 8⋅7 (6⋅5−10⋅2) 8⋅4 (7⋅6−11⋅1) 8⋅6 (6⋅5−10⋅4) 0⋅391
Protein 88 (78−128) 77 (75−130) 87 (57−116) 73 (57−129) 79 (67−97) 84 (74−107) 83 (67−107) 89 (59−111) 104 (77−117) 71 (56−99) 0⋅656
Fat 78 (54−100) 63 (42−85) 63 (24−97) 93 (31−100) 68 (32−71) 76 (73−86) 71 (49−88) 63 (53−78) 65 (59−101) 68 (51−101) 0⋅569
Carbohydrate 279 (216−346) 285 (253−280) 244 (153−596) 280 (191−399) 271 (11−346) 297 (215−332) 264 (161−405) 252 (178−317) 234 (230−363) 271 (194−295) 0⋅748
Fibre 31 (28−54) 24 (19−57) 20 (18−43) 20 (18−27) 28 (13−52) 30 (24−44) 33 (26−62) 32 (25−35) 32 (23−71) 30 (24−51) 0⋅033
Resistant starch 3 (1−4) 14 (13−19) 17 (16−24) 27 (21−28) 6 (2−7) 5 (3−10) 3 (2−10) 14 (13−16) 21 (13−22) 20 (20−24) <0⋅001

MJ, megajoule.

Data are shown as median (range) and are analysed via linear mixed models. Comparisons are made across the intervention periods, including baseline, with no multiple comparisons made.

a

Data log-transformed for analyses.