Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 2;11:e3. doi: 10.1017/jns.2022.1

Table 4.

Mean% agreement and 95 % LOA between the FFQs and 24 hRs for CVD-related food groups and nutrients in Northwest Mexican adolescents (n 221)

CVD-related food groups and nutrients Mean% agreementb (95 % CI) LOAc (%) Sloped
(ß) P valuee
Fruits & vegetables (cups/d) 226·9 (198·7, 258·8) 34·2−1505 −0·522 0·0001
Fish & shellfish (oz/wk) 156·9 (141·7, 177·6) 17·7−575·1 0·919 0·0001
Sodium (mg/d) 112·5 (99·5, 127·3) 18·3−692·3 0·002 0·989
SSBs (oz/wk) 164·1 (157·1, 171·8) 12·2−337 0·011 0·925
Whole grains (g/d) 148·7 (143·6, 154·6) 10·4−247·3 −0·126 0·22
Nuts, seeds & legumes mean (servings/wk)a 130·4 (123·8, 138·7) 50·5−466·2 1·244 0·0001
Processed meats (oz/wk) 198·9 (186·1, 1113·8) 16·5−1595·6 −0·026 0·828
Saturated fat (%kcal/d) 162·7 (158·4, 167·5) 121·8−1183 0·388 0·0001

LOA, limit of agreement; FFQ, food frequency questionnaire; 24 hR, 24-h recall; CVD, cardiovascular disease; CI, confidence intervals; wk, week; SSB, sugar-sweetened beverage.

a

Nuts, seeds & legumes were not individually analysed since differences in intakes for the majority of individuals were ≤0 and their natural logarithm do not exist; thus, many observations were considered as missing values.

b

Exp(mean(FFQ − 24 hR)), all nutrient data were natural log-transformed.

c

95 % LOA [mean difference ± t(n−1, 0·05) (sd differences)].

d

Slope of the average of methods regressed on the difference between the methods (H0: β = 0, α = 0·05).

e

Bold P values represent slopes (ß) that are close to 0 and are non-significant, which means that the variance of the differences does not vary across the range of means; thus, there is no proportional bias.