-
I.
Program Cost Evaluations
|
| Alonso 2019 |
Mozambique |
✓ |
Demonstration program with retrospective micro costing |
10-year-old girls |
2 doses: 2,791 FIG3 doses: 2,276 FIG |
-
•
Cost per FIG
-
•
HPV vaccine program cost
|
|
|
| Hidle 2018 |
Zimbabwe |
✓ |
Demonstration program with retrospective cost analysis |
10-year-old girls |
5,724 FIG |
-
•
Cost per FIG
-
•
HPV vaccine program cost
|
-
•
School-based delivery
-
•
Facility-based delivery
-
•
Outreach sites
|
|
| Levin 2013 |
PeruUgandaVietnam |
✓ |
Demonstration Program with retrospective micro costing |
Adolescent girls |
17, 268 FIG |
|
-
•
Peru: School-based delivery
-
•
Uganda: School-based and integrated outreach delivery
-
•
Vietnam: School-based and health-center-based delivery
|
|
| Quentin 2012 |
Tanzania |
--Sponsor-subsidized acquisition cost |
Demonstration program with retrospective top-down cost analysis from project’s perspective |
10-to12-year-old girls (class 4 and class 6) |
4,211 FIG |
|
|
-
•
because of more eligible girls being identified and higher vaccine uptake
-
•
Lower costs in urban areas compared to rural areas.
-
•
Incremental financial cost to scale up to 50,290 primary school girls estimated at US$276,00
-
•
Economic cost of US$9.76 per FIG excluding vaccine cost
|
| Soi 2019 |
Mozambique |
✓ |
Demonstration program with retrospective micro costing |
10-year-old girls |
Target population sizeYear 1: 8,556Year 2: 9,135 |
|
|
-
•
Higher implementation costs in year one compared to year two
-
•
Cost per FIG: $72 in year one, $38 in year two, and $54 for entire project period
|
|
| Blakely 2014 |
New Zealand |
– |
Markov modelHealth system’s perspective |
12-year-ollds |
National sample: 58,582 |
|
|
-
•
Cost-effectiveness of current program: NZ$18,800/QALY gained
-
•
ICER of $34,700/QALY for school-only program compared to school + PCP
-
•
Net cost for current program: NZ$4.65 million for 58,582 12-year-old
-
•
A mandatory vaccination law for HPV is not cost-effective.
|
| Wilson 2020 |
Texas, USA |
– |
Markov modelPayer’s perspective |
Uninsured and low-income adults |
1,036 received HPV vaccines |
|
|
-
•
At a cost-effective threshold of $100,00, HPV vaccination was cost effective with an ICER of $79,022/LYS
-
•
Program ICER: $67,940/LYS
-
•
A community immunization program is a cost-effective investment for uninsured, low income, high-risk adults
|
|
| Coley 2018 |
New York, USA |
– |
Randomized controlled trial |
11-to-13-year olds |
Intervention: 81,558Control: 80,894 |
|
|
-
•
Intervention increased vaccine initiation by 2.2% for 1st dose, 1.4% for 2nd dose, 0.01% for 3rd dose.
-
•
The intervention cost $30.95 for each adolescent who initiated the HPV vaccine series.
|
| Fiks 2013 |
Philadelphia, USA |
– |
Randomized controlled trial; cluster and patient-level randomization |
11-to-17-year-old girls |
Total: 22,486CDS: 5,557FFI: 5680CDS + FFI: 5,561No intervention: 5,68811 clinics |
|
-
•
FFI
-
•
CDS
-
•
Combined (FFI + CDS)
|
-
•
CDS was most effective for initiating the HPV vaccination series, FFI promoted completion, and CDS + FFI most effectively promoted series receipt.
-
•
For the 3 doses of HPV vaccines, the combined intervention increased vaccination rates from 16% to 25%, from 65% to 73%, and from 63% to 76%, respectively, compared with no intervention.
-
•
Low incremental cost for the more effective intervention versus no intervention: $6 for CDS for HPV#1, $10 and $6 for FFI for doses 2 and 3, respectively.
|
| Kempe 2012 |
Colorado, USA |
– |
Multi-method study: HPV vaccine demonstration project for girls only, and randomized controlled trial for boys |
Sixth graders attending public schools; girls only for HPV vaccines |
Total: 529Girls: 265 |
|
|
|
| Lefevere 2016 |
Flanders, Belgium |
– |
Retrospective cohort study analyzing claims data |
12-to-18-year-old girls |
Total: 6415Intervention: 850 |
|
|
-
•
PIC significantly increased vaccination initiation, with older girls responding faster.
-
•
One year after the campaign the difference in percentage points for HPV vaccination initiation between intervention and control groups varied between 18.5 % and 5.1%.
-
•
PIC increased costs by €0.59 (price of a stamp) per girl, and €450.69 per extra girl vaccinated
|
| Mantzari 2015 |
England, UK |
– |
Randomized controlled trial |
16-to-18-year-old girls |
Total: 1000 |
|
|
|
| Morris 2015 |
California, USA |
– |
Randomized controlled trial |
11-to-17-year-olds |
Intervention groups: 1,797Phone call only: 3,253Unsampled controls: 116,356 |
-
•
HPV vaccine series initiation
-
•
HPV vaccine series completion
-
•
Up-to-date (UTD) status
-
•
Time to UTD
-
•
Cost efficiency of reminder methods
|
|
-
•
UTD status reach by 32.1% of text message recipients, 23.3% for postcards, 20.8% for emails, and 12.4% for participants who received enrollment phone call only.
-
•
Mean costs for were $4.65 per postcard, $3.09 per e-mail, and $3.09 per text message enrollees.
-
•
The average cost for each text recipient to become UTD was $9.63 compared to $14.86 per UTD e-mail recipient and $20.22 per UTD postcard recipient.
|
| O’Leary 2015 |
Colorado, USA |
– |
Randomized controlled trial |
11-to-17-year-olds |
Intervention: 2,228Controls: 2,359 |
-
•
Uptake of any needed HPV vaccine dose
-
•
Missed opportunity for vaccination.
-
•
Cost of short messaging service (SMS)
|
-
•
Practice initiated SMS with parents choosing one of 3 options:
-
•
Clinic call parent to schedule
-
•
Parent call clinic to schedule
-
•
None
|
-
•
19% of intervention group compared to 15% of the control group received at least one dose of HPV vaccine
-
•
Responding that the clinic should call to schedule was associated with the highest effect size for completion of all needed services.
-
•
Net cost ranged from $855 to $3394 per practice.
-
•
Average costs per child were $2.64 to $10.48.
|
| Szilagyi 2013 |
New York, USA |
– |
Random selection of participants. Participants select choice of intervention |
11-to-17-year-olds |
|
|
-
•
Mailed reminder
-
•
Telephone reminder
|
-
•
HPV vaccine series uptake was similar across intervention groups (27% for 1st dose, 26% for 2nd dose, and 18% to 19% for 3rd dose).
-
•
The intervention cost $18.78 for mailed or $16.68 for phone per adolescent per year to deliver
-
•
The cost per additional adolescent fully vaccinated was $463.99 for mailed and $714.98 for telephone
|