Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e220625. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.0625

Table 3. Risk of Bias Among Observational Studies.

Source Study aspects scored for risk of biasa
Focus Cohort selection Exposure measurement Outcome measurement Confounding Follow-up Results Practice implication
Complete Accurate Believable Applicable Fit
Bardes et al,16 2017 Low Low Low Low Some concerns Some concerns Low Some concerns Some concerns Low Low Some concerns
Boutonnet et al,17 2018 Low Low High Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low
Chan et al,18 2019 Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low
Cole et al,19 2015 Low Low Low Low Low Some Low Some concerns Some concerns Low Low Some concerns
Dixon et al,20 2019 Low Low Low Low Some concerns Some concerns Low Some concerns Some concerns Low Low Low
El-Menyar et al,21 2020 Low Low Low Low Low Some concerns Low Some concerns Low Low Low Low
Glover et al,22 2019 High Low High Low High Low Low Some concerns Some concerns Low Low Low
Harvin et al,23 2015 Low Low High Low High Low Low Low Some concerns Low Low Low
Howard et al,24 2017 Low Low High Low Low Low Low Some concerns Some concerns High Low Some concerns
Johnston et al,25 2018 Low Low High Low High Low Low Low Some concerns High High Low
Khan et al,26 2018 Low Low High Low Low Low Low Some concerns Low Low Low Low
Lewis et al,27 2016 Low Low High Low High Some Low Some concerns High High Low Some
Luehr et al,28 2017 Low Low High Some High Low Low Some concerns Low Low High Low
Moore et al,29 2017 Low Low High Low High Low Low Low High Low Low High
Morrison et al,30 2012 Low Low Low Low High Low Low Low Some concerns Low Low Low
Morrison et al,31 2013 Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low High Low Low
Morte et al,32 2019 Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low High Low Low
Myers et al,33 2019 Low Low High Low Low Some concerns Low Low Some concerns Low High Some concerns
Neeki et al,34 2018 Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Some concerns Low Some concerns
Neeki et al,35 2020 Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Some concerns Low Some concerns
Shiraishi et al,36 2017 Low Low High Low Low Low Low Low Low Some concerns Low Low
Swendsen et al,37 2013 Low Low Some Low High Low Low Low Some concerns Low Low Some concerns
Valle et al,38 2014 Low Low Low High Low Some concerns Low Low Some concerns Some concerns High Some concerns
Wafaisade et al,39 2016 Low Low High Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low
Walker et al,40 2020 Low High High Low High Low Low Some concerns Some concerns High High Some concerns
a

Assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme.7 Each included study was scored on 12 aspects (from left to right): (1) whether the study addressed a clearly focused issue; (2) whether the cohort was chosen in an acceptable way; (3) whether the exposure was precisely measured to reduce bias; (4) whether the outcome was precisely measured to reduce bias; (5) whether the authors identified all significant confounding factors and whether they considered confounding factors in the design or analysis; (6) whether the follow-up of participants was complete and long enough; (7) whether the results of this study were complete; (8) whether the results were accurate; (9) whether the results were believable; (10) whether the results could be applied to local population; (11) whether the results fit with other available evidence; and (12) whether this study provided implications for practice.