Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Mar 2.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 May 8;219(1):95.e1–95.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.05.004

TABLE 4.

Comparing Options for Management: Patient-centered Results for Uterine Fibroids (COMPARE-UF) enrollment to date by procedure and age

Procedure Age, n
18–24 Y 25–29 Y 30–34 Y 35–40 Y 41–45 Y 46–50 Y ≥51 Y Unknown
Hysterectomy (n=764; 38%) 1 3 17 115 238 289 101 14
Myomectomy-abdominal (n=280; 14%) 3 16 80 99 50 28 4 5
Myomectomy-laparoscopic/robotic (n=386; 19%) 4 31 84 152 78 29 8 5
Myomectomy-hysteroscopic (n=255; 13%) 1 12 32 64 74 50 22 3
Myomectomy-vaginal (n=7; <1%) 0 1 0 3 0 2 1 0
Laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation (n=12; <1%) 0 0 0 3 2 3 4 0
Endometrial ablation (n=146; 7%) 0 0 2 22 54 52 16 5
Uterine artery embolization (n=125; 6%) 0 0 5 21 28 58 13 8
Magnetic resonance—guided focused ultrasound (n=15; <1%) 0 0 1 1 6 6 1 1
Progestin-releasing intrauterine device (n=0; 0%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0