Table 2.

Descriptive Data at Pretest

	#	%	#	%
Current Profession	175	-	43	-
Law Enforcement	5	2.9	1	2.3
Jail Personnel	9	4.9	2	4.7
Healthcare Professional*	81	46.3	16	37.2
Community Corrections	7	4.0	2	4.7
Probation	6	3.4	4	9.3
Peer Recovery Support	16	9.1	4	9.3
Other**	51	29.1	14	32.6
Work in Jail (Any Capacity)	166	-	41	-
Yes	61	36.7	15	36.6
No	105	63.3	26	63.4
	Mean (SD)	# Obs	Mean (SD)	# Obs
Years of Practice	12.4 (10.7)	161	15.0 (13.4)	39
Punishment Orientation***	1.88 (0.71)	164	1.80 (0.62)	42
Rehabilitation Orientation***	1.35 (0.46)	165	1.23 (0.32)	43
Objective Knowledge***	0.54 (0.17)	153	0.54 (0.17)	42
Additional Attitudes***
Offenders have few strengths…	1.96 (1.04)	156	2.05 (1.10)	42
Seriousness of offence should determine Tx	2.55 (1.05)	155	2.69 (1.09)	42
Tx cannot address motivation for change	1.91 (0.90)	156	1.88 (0.80)	42
Prison Tx should link to community Tx	1.39 (0.73)	156	1.21 (0.47)	42
People who use / sell drugs should get same Tx	2.29 (1.04)	156	2.19 (1.02)	42
Community counselors should know about Tx in prison	1.44 (0.67)	156	1.33 (0.48)	42
Complete intensive prison Tx → no need for community Tx	1.53 (0.77)	156	1.52 (0.83)	42
Important to have comprehensive individualized assessment for each offender	1.33 (0.58)	156	1.21 (0.42)	42
Not Tx responsibility to motivate behavior change	2.32 (0.95)	155	2.24 (0.88)	42
Impractical for Tx to provide tailored services	1.88 (0.83)	153	2.00 (0.87)	41
Only motivated offenders can be helped	2.71 (1.07)	156	2.48 (1.07)	42
All substance users should have same Tx	1.71 (0.75)	155	1.51 (0.55)	41

^*E.g. Physician, nurse, community health worker, crisis counselor, social worker

^**E.g. Government, state agency, public defender

^***Note: [1: Most Optimal Response; 5: Least Optimal Response] for all variables except Years of Practice and Objective Knowledge