Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 2;53:16. doi: 10.1186/s13567-022-01034-z

Table 3.

Protective efficacy of vaccine candidates against a B. ovis PA experimental challenge in rams.

Vaccine (CFU dose) No. infected animals/total (%)a No. infected organs/total (%)b No. severely infected animals (%)a,c/no. severely infected organs (%)b
Bov::CAΔwadB (1 × 1010) 11/14 (78.6) 41/112 (36.6) 4 (28.6)d/11 (9.8)d
Rev1::wbdRΔwbkC (2.5 × 1010) 7/14 (50.0) 30/112 (26.8)d 5 (35.7)/13 (11.6)d
H38ΔwbkF (2.5 × 1010) 2/14 (16.7)e,f 6/112 (5.4)e,f 1 (7.1)e,f/2 (1.8)e,f
Rev 1 (2 × 109) 3/14 (21.4)d 12/112 (10.7)e 1 (7.1)e/1 (0.9)e
Unvaccinated 11/13 (84.6) 64/104 (61.5) 9 (69.2)/30 (28.8)

aStatistical comparisons by Chi-square test (with Fisher-Yates correction when required). bStatistical comparisons by STEPBOOT MULTTEST (SAS); cseverely infected animals were those showing at least one organ sample with an infection level ≥ 3 (≥ 26 CFU/plate). dSignificant difference (P < 0.05) versus unvaccinated control; eHigh significant difference (P < 0.001) vs. unvaccinated control; fno significant (P > 0.05) versus Rev 1 vaccinated group.