Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 2;41:8. doi: 10.1186/s41043-022-00283-0

Table 3.

Effects of intervention on inflammation markers according to yogurt consumption

Before intervention After intervention p-value* Changes p-value*
Serum 25(OH)D (ng/mL)
Intervention 14.14 ± 5.04 20.88 ± 5.76  < 0.001 6.84  < 0.001
Control 17.34 ± 5.68 16.46 ± 3.93 0.1 0.88
hs-CRP (mg/L)
Intervention 1.25 (0.2–4.17) 1.1 (0.3–3.9) 0.005 0.15 0.8
Control 0.9 (0.05–3.2) 1.1 (0.32–4.52) 0.041 0.02
WBC (billion cells/L)
Intervention 6.56 ± 1.57 6.35 ± 1.68 0.099 0.21 0.3
Control 6.64 ± 1.5 6.57 ± 1.35 0.64 0.07
Neutrophil (percent)
Intervention 61.25 ± 6.01 55.45 ± 4.89  < 0.001 5.8 0.43
Control 58.38 ± 7.13 59.38 ± 4.63 0.29 1
Lymphocyte (percent)
Intervention 36.92 ± 6.52 34.17 ± 5.05 0.004 2.75 0.07
Control 36.18 ± 6.48 35.28 ± 4.45 0.058 0.9
Platelets (billion/L)
Intervention 273.81 ± 36.97 216.82 ± 44.23  < 0.001 56.99 0.108
Control 235.10 ± 53.07 230.44 ± 54.06 0.18 4.66
RDW (percent)
Intervention 13.18 ± 1.13 11.58 ± 1.47  < 0.001 1.6 0.39
Control 13.32 ± 0.93 13.35 ± 1.13 0.67 0.03
NLR
Intervention 1.73 ± 0.43 1.66 ± 0.33 0.3 0.07 0.14
Control 1.7 ± 0.52 1.77 ± 0.33 0.27 0.07
PLR
Intervention 7.66 ± 1.76 6.52 ± 1.8  < 0.001 1.14 0.74
Control 6.73 ± 2.08 6.79 ± 1.8 0.21 0.06
RPR
Intervention 0.056 ± 0.01 0.049 ± 0.008  < 0.001 0.07 0.101
Control 0.061 ± 0.02 0.06 ± 0.017 0.8 0.01

*Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation and were tested by ANOVA test