Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 2;24:62. doi: 10.1186/s13075-022-02745-6

Table 1.

Demographic data of cohort 1 at the time of first available serum sample*

IIM/ASSD (n=44) Anti-Jo1+ (n=19) Anti-Jo1 (n=25)
Age, mean years (SD) 57 (13) 52 (14) 61 (12)a
Women, n (%) 24 (55) 9 (47) 15 (60)
Disease duration in months, median (25–75th percentiles)** 0 (0–1) 1 (0–10) 0 (0–1)
Anti-synthetase syndrome (ASSD), n (%) 28 (64) 19 (100) 9 (36)b
Muscular manifestations, n ever (%)
 Muscle weakness (pathological MMT8 and/or FI-2) 35 (83) 15 (79) 20 (87)
 Muscle enzymes elevation (CK, LD, ASAT, ALAT) 35 (83) 15 (79) 20 (87)
 Muscle inflammatory infiltrates 26 (62) 11 (58) 15 (65)
Extra-muscular manifestations, n ever (%)
 Interstitial lung disease (ILD) 25 (57) 16 (84) 9 (36)c
 Skin rash*** 14 (32) 5 (26) 9 (36)
 Arthritis 18 (41) 11 (58) 7 (28)
 Dysphagia 9 (21) 3 (16) 6 (24)
 Raynaud’s phenomenon 2 (5) 2 (11) 0 (0)
Smoking status, n ever (%) 24 (55) 10 (53) 14 (56)
Laboratory tests
 CK, median μcat/L (25–75th percentiles) 4.3 (1.4–14.2) 3.8 (1.1–9.0) 4.4 (1.6–16.2)
 CRP, median mg/L (25–75th percentiles) 4.0 (0.9–8.3) 7.0 (2.0–9.0) 2.0 (0.5–8.0)
Autoantibodies
 Positive anti-PL7, n (%) 2 (5.1) 0 2 (8.3)
 Positive anti-PL12, n (%) 2 (5.1) 0 2 (8.3)
 Positive anti-EJ, n (%) 1 (2.6) 0 1 (4.2)
 Positive anti-OJ, n (%) 3 (7.7) 0 3 (12.5)
 Positive anti-Mi-2, n (%) 3 (7.9) 1 (7.1) 2 (8.3)
 Positive anti-SRP, n (%) 2 (5.1) 0 2 (8.3)
 Positive anti-MDA5, n (%) 3 (7.9) 0 3 (12.5)
 Positive anti-TIF1g, n (%) 3 (7.9) 0 3 (12.5)
 Positive anti-SSA, n (%) 16 (36.4) 10 (52.6) 6 (24.0)
 Positive anti-Ro52, n (%) 12 (38.7) 8 (47.1) 4 (28.6)
 Positive anti-SSB, n (%) 0 0 0
 Positive anti-U1 RNP, n (%) 5 (11.4) 2 (10.5) 3 (12.0)
 Positive anti-Ku, n (%) 1 (2.5) 0 1 (4.0)
 Positive anti-PmScl, n (%) 2 (4.9) 1 (6.3) 1 (4.0)
Physician VAS, median (25–75th percentiles) 40 (25– 60) 45 (32–60) 40 (17–50)
Patient VAS, median (25–75th percentiles) 40 (16–69) 44 (19–70) 32 (11–68)
HAQ (1–3), median (25–75th percentiles) 0.88 (0.00–1.50) 0.75 (0.19–1.25) 1.00 (0.00–1.63)
MMT-8 (0–80), median (25–75th percentiles) 78 (67–80) 79 (77–80) 75 (64–80)
Muscle activity score VAS, median (25–75th percentiles) 15 (0 37.5) 4.5 (0–35.5) 15 (0–37.5)
MDAAT, median (25–75th percentiles) 0.07 (0.05–0.16) 0.12 (0.05–0.17) 0.06 (0.03–0.16)
Extra-muscular activity, median (25–75th percentiles) 32 (15–40) 40 (11–43) 24 (16–34)
Immunosuppressive (IS) treatment, n (%)
 No treatment 10 (26) 4 (25) 6 (26)
 1 treatment 10 (26) 2 (13) 8 (35)
 2 or 3 concomitant treatments 19 (49) 10 (63) 9 (39)
Healthy controls (n=24)
Age, mean years (SD) 59.3 (13.0)
Women, n (%) 12 of 24 (50)

*First available serum samples collected: (i) at diagnosis (0 months), sera were available from 6 anti-Jo1+ and 14 anti-Jo1 patients; (ii) before diagnosis, sera were available from 3 anti-Jo1+ and 4 anti-Jo1 patients (median months [25–75th percentile], −1 [−3 to −1] and −10[−19.5 to −4.25], respectively); (iii) after diagnosis, sera were available from 10 anti-Jo1+ and 7 anti-Jo1− patients (9 [1–99] and 1 [1–4], respectively).

IIM idiopathic inflammatory myopathies; ASSD anti-synthetase syndrome; CK creatinine kinase (reference values: 0.6–3.5 μkat/L); CRP C-reactive protein (0–3 mg/L); VAS visual analogue scale; MDDAT Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool; HAQ Health Assessment Questionnaire; MMT-8 Manual Muscle Testing

1 treatment designates one of the following: methotrexate (Mtx), glucocorticoids (GC), intravenous immunoglobulin, or abatacept; 2 or 3 concomitant treatments designate all the possible following combinations: GC + azathioprine (Aza), GC + cyclophosphamide, GC + Mtx, GC + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), GC + rituximab, GC + cyclophosphamide + rituximab, GC + Mtx + rituximab, or GC + MMF + rituximab

**Disease duration was calculated based on month and year of clinical diagnosis; ***Skin rash features: Periungual erythema, mechanic’s hand, Gottron’s sign, Gottron’s papules, V-sign, shawl sign, alopecia, erythroderma, periorbital edema, heliotrope rash

ap = 0.0236; bp < 0.0001; cp = 0.0020 vs anti-Jo1+ (Mann-Whitney’s test for quantitative variables and Fisher’s exact test for analysis of categorical variables were employed)