Table 1.

Comparison of metal nanoparticles (MNPs) based disposable sensors.

Analyte	Electrode Material	Techniques	Potential (V)	Linearity (mM)		Sensitivity (μAmM−1cm−2)		Limit of Detection (μM)	Ref
Glucose	Enzymatic glucose sensors
	Ir-C	Cyclic Voltammetry/Amperometry	0.2	0–15		–	28		46
	PGE	Amperometry	0.5	0.02–1.11		22.05	2.7		53
	GOx/Naf/MnO2−/GNR/SPCE	Amperometry	0.5	0.1–1.4		56.32	0.050		54
	GOx/graphene/PFLO/AuNPs	Amperometry	−0.7	0.1–1.5		7.357	0.081		55
	CS-GNPs-Fe3O4/GOx	Cyclic Voltammetry/Amperometry	−0.4	0.003–0.57		–	1.2		56
	Non-enzymatic glucose sensors
	CuNWs/GTE	Cyclic Voltammetry	+0.6	0.005–6.0		1100	1.6		93
	PtCuO/rGO/SPE	Linear Sweep Voltammograms/Amperometry	+0.6	0.005–12		3577	0.01		94
	CuNCs/DLEG	Chronoampero-metry/Cyclic Voltammetry	+0.55	0.025–4.5		4532	0.25		95
	AuCuO/rGO/SPE	Linear Sweep Voltammograms/Chronoampero-metry	+0.6	0.001–12		2356	0.1		96
	Cu NPs/PGE	Cyclic Voltammetry	+0.55	0.1–6.0		1467.5	0.44		97
	Cu/Co/rGO/PGE	Cyclic Voltammetry	+0.4	0.001–4		2400	0.15		98
	rGO/CuSNFs/GCE	Cyclic Voltammetry	+0.4	0.001–2		53.5 μM/(cm2 mM)	0.19		99
	LSCP/NN	Cyclic Voltammetry/Amperometry	+0.50	0.0008–2.50 (Enzyme free) 4.5–15.2 (Binder free)		3415	0.020		100
	3D porous Ni Networks	Cyclic Voltammetry/Chronoampero-metry	+0.50	0.0005–4		2900	0.07		101
	Ni(OH)2/PGE	Cyclic Voltammetry/Amperometry	+0.57	0.004–3.5 3.5–9		948	2.0		102
H2O2	Enzymatic hydrogen peroxide sensors
	HRP/AuNP/CHIT/SPCE	Cyclic Voltammetry/Amperometry	−0.4	0.01–11.3		176	0.65		72
	AuNP/ITO	Cyclic Voltammetry	0.167	0.008–3.0		–	2		73
	PtNP/NAE	Cyclic Voltammetry/Amperometry	0.65	0.02–20		194.6	1.0		74
	Non-enzymatic hydrogen peroxide sensors
	P2AB/AuNPs/PGE	Chronoampero -metry/Cyclic Voltammetry	−0.8	0.06–100	3950		0.367		115
	Au-rGO-SPE	Linear Sweep Voltammograms/Amperometry	−0.4	0.02–10	1238		0.1		116
	AuNPs/ITO	Cyclic Voltammetry/Amperometry	−0.4	0.1–15	–		0.08		117
	Ag/MWCNT/	Cyclic Voltammetry	−0.3		–		–		119
	PdCu/SPCE	Cyclic Voltammetry	−0.3	0.5–11	396.7		0.7		100