Benes 1999.
Methods | Randomised controlled crossover trial of levodopa versus placebo Dropouts/withdrawals: PP of 32 with premature discontinuations of 3 patients in the treatment group. |
|
Participants | Included/analysed: 35/32 Demographics: 13 male, age 56 years Diagnosis: RLS according to IRLSSG, PLMS/h > 5, symptoms for at least 2 weeks, sleep onset latency > 30 min and/or sleep efficiency ≤ 85% Setting: 3 centres in Germany Baseline: PLMI (using actigraphy) 49.5 ± 29.2 |
|
Interventions | Intervention: flexible uptitration of single dose levodopa/benserazide from 100 mg/25 mg to 200 mg/50 mg in 3 weeks, maintenance for 1 week Control: flexible uptitration of single dose placebo capsules in 3 weeks, maintenance for 1 week No washout between treatment periods |
|
Outcomes | Change of symptoms: CGI‐Improvement Objective quality of sleep: PLM‐Index (using actigraphy) Self rated quality of sleep: SF‐A Quality of life: VAS on life satisfaction Safety: Number of drop outs due to adverse events, number of patients experiencing adverse events |
|
funding source | The study was supported by a grant from Hoffmann La‐Roche, Inc. | |
Notes | PLMI: index of number of periodic limb movements per hour time in bed; CGI‐I: Clinical Gobla Impressions ‐ Improvement; SF‐A: Schlaffragebogen‐A; VAS: Visual Analogue Scale | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Adequate sequence generation? | Low risk | Randomisation list was produced by the statistical department of the sponsor. |
Allocation concealment? | Low risk | Patients had to be allocated to a numbered medication in ascending order. Due to the blinding of the medication, investigators and patients were not informed regarding treatment sequence or medication. |
Blinding? All outcomes | Unclear risk | White capsules of identical size and shape, the capsules were not differentiable. The capsules which had to be taken in one cross‐over period were filled in a glass and labelled with "week 3‐6" and "week 7‐10", respectively. Blinding of polysomnography raters was not mentioned. |
Incomplete outcome data addressed? All outcomes | Low risk | No incomplete outcome data. |
Free of selective reporting? | Low risk | All results reported as prespecified with additional sleep data. |
Free of other bias? | Low risk | Low indication of bias. |