BI 2006.
Methods | Randomised controlled crossover trial of levodopa dual release versus pramipexole Dropouts/withdrawals: PP of 39 with 28 premature discontinuations |
|
Participants | Included/analysed: 67/39 Demographics: 41% male, age 56.9 years Diagnosis: RLS according to IRLSSG, symptom presence almost every day, PLMI > 5 Setting: 6 Swiss centres including Basel, Bern, Lugano, Luzern, Zürich, Zurzach Baseline: IRLS score of 21.1 (levodopa) and 20.8 (ppx), PLMI (actigraphy) of 21.1 (levodopa) and 21.5 (ppx) |
|
Interventions | Intervention 1: flexible uptitration of single dose pramipexole from 0.25 to 0.75 mg in 2 weeks, maintenance for 2 weeks Intervention 2: flexible uptitration of single dose levodopa‐dual‐release from 100/25 mg to 300/75 mg for 2 weeks, maintenance for 2 weeks 2 weeks washout between treatment periods |
|
Outcomes | Change of symptoms: IRLS, CGI responders Objective quality of sleep: PLMI (using actigraphy) Safety: number of dropouts due to adverse events, number of patients with adverse events |
|
funding source | The study was supported by Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH. | |
Notes | IRLS: International RLS Severity Rating Scale; ppx: pramipexole | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Adequate sequence generation? | Low risk | Randomisation schedule was provided by BI Pharma GmbH & Co KG. |
Allocation concealment? | Low risk | Medication package with the lowest available number was allocated to the patient. |
Blinding? All outcomes | Unclear risk | Tablets were packaged in identical hard gelatine capsules, the code was restricted to authorised personnel, such as staff involved in packaging of study medication. Blinding of data analysts not reported. |
Incomplete outcome data addressed? All outcomes | Low risk | Dropouts and reasons reported by BI on request. |
Free of selective reporting? | Low risk | Results reported as prespecified. |
Free of other bias? | Low risk | Low indication of other bias. |