Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb 15;2011(2):CD005504. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005504.pub2

BI 2006.

Methods Randomised controlled crossover trial of levodopa dual release versus pramipexole
Dropouts/withdrawals: PP of 39 with 28 premature discontinuations
Participants Included/analysed: 67/39
Demographics: 41% male, age 56.9 years
Diagnosis: RLS according to IRLSSG, symptom presence almost every day, PLMI > 5
Setting: 6 Swiss centres including Basel, Bern, Lugano, Luzern, Zürich, Zurzach
Baseline: IRLS score of 21.1 (levodopa) and 20.8 (ppx), PLMI (actigraphy) of 21.1 (levodopa) and 21.5 (ppx)
Interventions Intervention 1: flexible uptitration of single dose pramipexole from 0.25 to 0.75 mg in 2 weeks, maintenance for 2 weeks
Intervention 2: flexible uptitration of single dose levodopa‐dual‐release from 100/25 mg to 300/75 mg for 2 weeks, maintenance for 2 weeks
2 weeks washout between treatment periods
Outcomes Change of symptoms: IRLS, CGI responders
Objective quality of sleep: PLMI (using actigraphy)
Safety: number of dropouts due to adverse events, number of patients with adverse events
funding source The study was supported by Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH.
Notes IRLS: International RLS Severity Rating Scale; ppx: pramipexole
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Low risk Randomisation schedule was provided by BI Pharma GmbH & Co KG.
Allocation concealment? Low risk Medication package with the lowest available number was allocated to the patient.
Blinding? 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Tablets were packaged in identical hard gelatine capsules, the code was restricted to authorised personnel, such as staff involved in packaging of study medication. Blinding of data analysts not reported.
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes Low risk Dropouts and reasons reported by BI on request.
Free of selective reporting? Low risk Results reported as prespecified.
Free of other bias? Low risk Low indication of other bias.