Trenkwalder 1995.
Methods | Randomised controlled crossover trial of levodopa versus placebo Dropouts/withdrawals: PP of 28, 4 premature discontinuations (2 before drug intake) |
|
Participants | Included/analysed: 32/28 Demographics: 18 male, age 52.0 years Diagnosis: primary and secondary RLS according to descriptive criteria, PLMS‐AI > 5, sleep onset latency > 25 and/or sleep efficiency < 85% Setting: 1 centre in Germany Baseline: severity on RLS rating scale 7.9 (0 to 10 points = severe) |
|
Interventions | Intervention: flexible uptitration of single dose levodopa/benserazide from 100 mg/25 mg to 200 mg/50 mg in 2 weeks, maintenance for 2 weeks Control: single dose placebo capsules for 4 weeks No washout between treatment periods |
|
Outcomes | Change of symptoms: CGI‐I, VAS on severity of RLS symptoms during the night Objective quality of sleep: TST, PLMSI (using PSG) Self rated quality of sleep: VAS on quality of sleep Quality of Life: VAS on life satisfaction Safety: Number of dropouts due to adverse events, number of patients experiencing adverse events |
|
funding source | No funding stated. | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Adequate sequence generation? | Low risk | Randomisation was done by the sponsor with a computer based system. |
Allocation concealment? | Low risk | Patient randomisation numbers were allocated sequentially in the order of recruitment of patients. The allocated number was then the patient code. |
Blinding? All outcomes | Unclear risk | Unblinding was done after the complete database had been transferred to the sponsor. |
Incomplete outcome data addressed? All outcomes | Low risk | No incomplete outcome data. |
Free of selective reporting? | Low risk | All results reported as prespecified with additional questionnaire data. |
Free of other bias? | Low risk | Low indication of bias. |