Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 5;2020(8):CD011504. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011504.pub3

10. Unconditional cash transfers – results of included prospective controlled studies.

Study ID
(risk of bias)
Study design (n) Unconditional cash transfers No intervention Effect measure (time point) Effect directiona Meta‐analysis (yes/no)
Results at baseline Results at follow‐up n Results at baseline Results at follow‐up n
1.3.2 Dietary diversity
1.3.2.1 Outcome measure: Dietary diversity scores, including composite Food Consumption Score (FCS) (weighted) (mean, SD) (scores refer to number food groups consumed; reference periods and scales vary)
Breisinger 2018 (‐) PCS (6003 HHs) – HDDS NR 9.58 (1.38) 2190? NR 9.48 (1.55) 3813? MD (SE) 0.16 (0.117), 95% CI –0.06932 to 0.38932, P > 0.1 (1 year??) N/A
Breisinger 2018 (‐) PCS (5799 HHs) – mother DDS) NR 4.21 (1.28) 2190? NR 4.04 (1.26) 3813? MD 0.011 (SE 0.100), 95% CI –0.185 to 0.207, P > 0.1 (1 year?),
Breisinger 2018 (‐) PCS (1684 HHs) DDS children aged 6–23 months NR 3.35 (1.73) 2190? NR 3.39 (1.61) 3813? MD –0.342 (SE 0.209) 95% CI –0.752 to 0.068, P > 0.1 (1 year)
Breisinger 2018 (‐) PCS (3202 HHs) DDS children aged 24–59 months NR 5.09 (1.37) 2190? NR 4.89 (1.40) 3813? MD –0.057 (SE 0.144) 95% CI –0.33924 to 0.22524, P > 0.1 (1 year)
1.5Change in anthropometric indicators
1.5.1Height‐for‐age z‐scores; chronic undernutrition)
1.5.1.1 Outcome measure: proportion stunted (HAZ < –2SD)
Renzaho 2017 (‐) Prospective controlled study (n = 1491) 66.7 59.8 748 63 52.9 743 Adjusted DID (pp): –5.16, 95% CI –9.55 to –0.77 (5 years), SE 2.2
1.5.1.3 Outcome measure: HAZ (mean, SD)
Aguero 2006 (‐) PCS –0.84   –1.08 NR (MD 0.15 at 45%, and 0.25 at 80% of nutritional window; data derived from graph (6 years)) No. SE not available for all studies.
Renzaho 2017 (‐) PCS (1491 children) –2.6 (1.4) –2.2 (1.4) 748 –2.3 (1.3) –2.1 (1.3) 743 Adjusted DID: 0.18, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.27 (5 years)
1.5.2WHZ; acute undernutrition/wasting
1.5.2.1 Outcome measure: proportion wasted (WHZ < –2SD) (proportion)
Renzaho 2017 (‐) PCS (1491 children) 12.7 5.7 748 5.8 6.4 743 Adjusted DID: pp –2.84, 95% CI –5.58 to –0.1 (5 years)  
1.5.2.3 Outcome measure: WHZ (mean, SD)
Renzaho 2017 (‐) PCS (1491 children) –0.8 (1.1) –0.4 (1.0) 748 –0.5 (0.9) –0.4 (1.1) 743 Adjusted DID: MD 0.19, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.3 (5 years)  
1.5.3 Weight‐for‐age z‐score (WAZ; underweight)
1.5.3.1 Outcome measure: proportion underweight (WAZ <2SD)
Renzaho 2017 (‐) PCS (1491 children) 50.7 34.8 748 37.3 28.9 743 Adjusted DID: pp –7.35, 95% CI –11.62 to –3.08 (5 years) N/A
1.5.3.3 Outcome measure: mean WAZ
Renzaho 2017 (‐) PCS (1491 children) –2.1 (1.1) –1.6 (1.1) 748 –1.7 (1.0) –1.4 (1.1) 743 Adjusted DID:
0.22, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.29 (5 years)
N/A

aEach triangle represents one study.

= Favours the intervention, 95% CI excludes 0; △ = Unclear effect potentially favouring the intervention, 95% CI includes zero; ▼ = Favours the control, 95% CI excludes 0; ▽ = Unclear effect potentially favouring the control, 95% CI includes 0. (+): low overall risk of bias; (?): unclear overall risk of bias; (‐): high overall risk of bias.

DDS: Dietary Diversity Score; DID: difference in differences; HAZ: height‐for‐age z‐score; HH: household; MD: mean difference; n: number; N/A: not applicable/available; NR: not reported; PCS: prospective controlled study; SD: standard deviation; SE: standard error; WAZ: weight‐for‐age z‐score; WHZ: weight‐for‐height z‐score.