Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 2;17(3):e0264010. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264010

Table 3. Distribution of verbal, performance and total cognition raw scores, and IQ at 9 years in children who were stunted at various time points of follow-up in MAL-ED cohort (N = 200#).

Groups, n Verbal scores, mean (SD) Performance scores, mean (SD) Total scores, mean (SD)
Raw scores IQ P value * Raw scores IQ P value * Raw scores IQ P value *
Children who were never stunted (n = 109) 475.96 (47.56) 95.19 (9.51) 0.024 467.64 (61.87) 93.54 (12.40) 0.051 943.60 (97.48) 94.37 (9.75) 0.036
Stunted at 2 years and catch-up at 5 years (n = 34) 474.18 (47.93) 94.85 (9.54) 439.41 (83.67) 87.88 (16.73) 913.59 (122.65) 91.36 (12.27)
Stunted at 2 and 5 years, and, catch-up at 9 years (n = 36) 457.75 (49.88) 91.55 (9.98) 452.36 (59.68) 90.47 (11.94) 910.11 (101.13) 91.01 (10.11)
Stunted at 2, 5 and 9 years (n = 21) 445.76 (45.77) 89.15 (9.15) 435.79 (51.51) 87.16 (10.30) 881.55 (84.86) 88.16 (8.49)

#200/203(98.52%) children who had complete information on stunting at all three time points were included in this analysis.

*Statistical significance between the groups for verbal IQ, performance IQ and total IQ was tested using ANOVA.