Table 2.
Regression models of effects of METS-IR on new-onset NAFLD.
| Exposure | Crude model | Model 1 | Model 2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | P value | HR (95% CI) | P value | HR (95% CI) | P value | |
| Q1 (18.88-27.66) | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | |||
| Q2 (27.66-30.93) | 4.74 (3.38, 6.65) | <0.001 | 2.76 (1.95, 3.91) | <0.001 | 2.69 (1.87, 3.86) | <0.001 |
| Q3 (30.94-34.33) | 11.11 (8.06, 15.33) | <0.001 | 4.56 (3.21, 6.46) | <0.001 | 4.25 (2.86, 6.30) | <0.001 |
| Q4 (34.33-67.05) | 24.34 (17.75, 33.38) | <0.001 | 7.82 (5.46, 11.21) | <0.001 | 6.40 (4.06, 10.08) | <0.001 |
| P for trend | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
Crude model adjusted for none. Model 1 adjusted for age, sex, and BMI. Model 2 adjusted for the variables in Model 1 plus ALP, TG, GGT, HDL-C, ALT, BUN, AST, Cr, UA, FPG, SBP, LDL-C, and DBP. Abbreviations: CI: confidence interval; HR: hazard ratio. Other abbreviations as in Table 1.