Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 24;16(1):14–31. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1731837

Table 5. Characteristics of the selected studies in implantology.

S. no Author, Year, Country VR system Participants Study design Assessment tool Tested outcome Results
Abbreviations: CST, cross sectional trial; DS, dental students; RCT, randomized controlled trial; VR, virtual reality.
1 Qi et al 2013 China 72 Active and passive controlling 3D virtual webpages (95) 1st and 2nd year
DS
RCT Post-training assessment of knowledge on dental implant restoration Relative quality of information acquisition Passive 3D control had significant high scores, a significant correlation existed between the scores on a mental rotations test and the subjects’ performance on the post-test
2 Joseph et al 2014, France 68 Virteasy, haptic dental simulator (implant surgery) (40) 3rd year DS,
(20) Experienced practitioners
RCT Implant drilling in the 1st molar region in a custom-made mandibular resin model Accuracy of implant placement and drilling times The results of the simulator group were significantly close to the experienced operators
3 Golob Deeb et al 2019, United States 69 Dynamic guidance system software for virtual
implant placement
(14) Predoctoral students CST Five implant placements (3 maxillary or 4 mandibular) positions Surgical time horizontal, vertical, and angulation discrepancies Significant reduction in time from 1st to 2nd trial, then plateaued. 3D angulation and 2D vertical apex deviation improved with each attempt, but changes in lateral 2D and overall 3D apex deviations were not significant
4 Zhang et al 2020, China 70 VR simulation platform (166) 2 nd and 3 rd year DS RCT Pre- and post-theoretical test, subjective evaluation of operation procedures, implant accuracy in CBCT, and questionnaire Procedural accuracy vs. jaw-bone simulation
Degree of satisfaction
VR combined with jawbone groups had significantly higher increase in scores and showed better implant precision in CBCT than the other groups. Students preferred the combined of jawbone and VR reality simulation
5 Zorzal et al 2021, Brazil 71 IMMPLANT VR simulator uses smartphone and laptops (16) dental postgraduates CST Place a virtual implant at a specific bone-loss area location within a subject-specific 3D model of a lower jaw Participants feedback regarding benefits and limitations VR system is easy to use and promotes greater spatial awareness of the 3D dental model and easy to learn but they reported difficulty selecting the predetermined implant position and inclination