Table 2.
Performance of different methods.
| Methods | Sparse ratio (%) | Type | Time consuming (s) | Reconstruction accuracy (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CoSaMP | 6.25 | Compressed sensing | 3.85 ± 0.04 | 3.64 |
| IHT | 6.25 | Compressed sensing | 0.20 ± 0.01 | 10.83 |
| IRLS | 6.25 | Compressed sensing | 2.41 ± 0.03 | 62.07 |
| SP | 6.25 | Compressed sensing | 0.56 ± 0.02 | 71.91 |
| DISP | 6.25 | Distributed down-sampling | 0.24 ± 0.01 | 100 |
| CoSaMP | 25 | Compressed sensing | 54.50 ± 0.5 | 19.41 |
| IHT | 25 | Compressed sensing | 0.96 ± 0.02 | 55.38 |
| IRLS | 25 | Compressed sensing | 23.89 ± 0.1 | 85.92 |
| SP | 25 | Compressed sensing | 3.96 ± 0.04 | 86.45 |
| DISP | 25 | Distributed down-sampling | 0.25 ± 0.01 | 100 |