Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 23;119(9):e2108581119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2108581119

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Effect of chronic HFD and perinatal probiotic treatment on F0 maternal Bifidobacterium spp., Lactobacillus spp., and gut, liver, plasma and brain metabolites. (A) Study design schematic. F0, maternal generation; F1, offspring generation. (B) Mixed-effects modeling of time, HFD, and probiotic treatment grouping on maternal body weight. Significant main effects of time [F(2.1,25.6) = 82.98, P < 0.0001] and diet [F(1,12) = 9.62, P = 0.0092] with significant time × probiotic [F(15,180) = 2.82] and time × diet [F(15,180) = 11.09] interactions. No main effect of probiotic treatment [F(1,12) = 1.24, P = 0.29]. (C) Maternal fecal Lactobacillus spp. levels. Probiotic treatment increased Lactobacillus spp. levels relative to vehicle controls [two-way ANOVA, main effect, F(1,10) = 12.51] independent of diet and without interaction [F(1,10) = 3.01]. (D) Maternal fecal Bifidobacterium spp. levels. Significant diet × probiotic interaction [Q(1,12) = 9.58]. Post hoc Tukey tests revealed that levels of Bifidobacterium spp. were highest in the CD/probiotic dams compared to all other groups. (E) PCA scores plot of all maternal gut, liver, plasma, and brain metabolites by 1H NMR spectroscopy. R 2X = 0.52 with three principal components. (F) Heatmap of key discriminatory maternal metabolites determined by PLS-DA. Data are presented as median ± interquartile range. ##P < 0.01 (indicating main effect of maternal probiotic treatment); ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001 (indicating significant post hoc difference, computed only in the case of a significant diet × probiotic treatment interaction). Int., interaction; ns, not significant. n = 4 per group. Metabolomic descriptive statistics are reported in SI Appendix, Figs. S4–S7 and Tables S1–S5.