Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 2;79(4):287–299. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.0010

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics at Baseline and Treatment Integrity Test Results.

Characteristic Patientsa
TAU arm (n = 246) PGST arm (n = 125) IGST arm (n = 123)
Age, mean (SD), y 33.89 (9.55) 33.20 (9.33) 33.46 (9.17)
Sex
Female 212 (86.2) 109 (87.2) 105 (85.4)
Male 33 (13.4) 16 (12.8) 17 (13.8)
Other or unknown 1 (0.4) 0 (0) 1 (0.8)
Relationship status
Partner 99 (40.2) 41 (32.8) 41 (33.3)
No partner 147 (59.8) 84 (67.2) 82 (66.7)
Educational level, mean (SD)b 3.2 (1.6) 3.4 (1.6) 3.4 (1.7)
Ethnicity
Same as dominant group at study site 230 (93.5) 118 (94.4) 106 (86.2)
Different from dominant group at study site 16 (6.5) 7 (5.6) 17 (13.8)
Employment statusc
Employed 79 (32.2) 34 (27.2) 34 (27.9)
Homemaker 16 (6.5) 6 (4.8) 7 (5.7)
Student 26 (10.6) 13 (10.4) 8 (6.6)
Disability or illness benefit 95 (38.8) 59 (47.2) 49 (40.2)
Unemployed 29 (11.8) 13 (10.4) 24 (19.7)
GAF score, mean (SD) 49.70 (8.69) 50.09 (8.10) 48.36 (8.32)
BPD severity
BPD criteria (SCID-II), mean (SD), No. 6.83 (1.33) 7.05 (1.38) 6.81 (1.30)
BPDSI total score, mean (SD) 31.63 (8.60) 30.95 (8.75) 30.44 (8.74)
Comorbid disorders
DSM-IV Axis I diagnoses (SCID-I), mean (SD), No. 3.31 (2.15) 3.57 (2.13) 3.76 (2.23)
DSM-IV Axis II diagnoses (SCID-II), mean (SD), No.d 1.74 (1.04) 1.87 (1.01) 1.76 (1.02)
PD
Avoidant 77 (31.3) 37 (29.6) 47 (38.2)
Dependent 20 (8.1) 10 (8.0) 14 (11.4)
Obsessive-compulsive 38 (15.4) 19 (15.2) 18 (14.6)
Paranoid 48 (19.5) 21 (16.8) 27 (22.0)
Schizotypal 3 (1.2) 1 (0.8) 0 (0)
Schizoid 1 (0.4) 3 (2.4) 1 (0.8)
Histrionic 0 (0) 1 (0) 0 (0)
Conduct disorder youth 52 (21.1) 33 (26.4) 26 (21.1)
Antisocial Ae 2 (0.8) 1 (0.8) 4 (3.3)
TIS rating, mean (SE)f
Nonspecific subscale 50.69 (0.93)g 53.76 (1.19) 54.85 (1.16)
Specific subscale 39.21 (0.86)g 48.18 (1.13) 50.68 (1.09)
Non-ST subscale 4.74 (0.11) 4.47 (0.15) 4.77 (0.15)

Abbreviations: BPD, borderline personality disorder; BPDSI, Borderline Personality Disorder Severity Index; GAF, Global Assessment of Functioning; IGST, combination of individual and group schema therapy; PD, personality disorder; PGST, predominantly group schema therapy; SCID-I, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders; SCID-II, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Disorders; ST, schema therapy; TAU, (optimal) treatment as usual; TIS, therapy integrity scale.

a

Data are presented as the number (percentage) of patients unless otherwise indicated.

b

Based on the International Standard Classification of Education, 2011 version, with a range of 0 to 8.

c

Two patients had missing responses (1 from the TAU group and 1 from the IGST group).

d

Included BPD.

e

Full antisocial PD was an exclusion criterion, as was narcissistic PD.

f

Means and SEs were from mixed regression of the TIS ratings at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months.

g

The TAU group had significantly lower TIS scores than did the ST groups (TAU vs PGST: d, 0.34; TAU vs IGST: d, 0.90; P < .001); scores from the PGST and IGST groups did not differ significantly from each other. Analyzed with linear mixed models with treatment and time in the fixed part, random intercept and slope for time for cohort within site, and autoregressive moving average (1,1) covariance for the repeated part.