TABLE 1.
Diagnostic options for Cryptosporidium detection in clinical samples
| Technique | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Acid-fast stain (Ziehl-Neelsen, Kinyoun) | Low cost | Low sensitivity and specificity |
| Auramine-rhodamine | Rapid screening | Low sensitivity and specificity; high cost (equipment) |
| EIA | Sensitive (32.9 ng of Cryptosporidium protein [Meridian Diagnostics, Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio]); minimal training required | High cost |
| IFA | Sensitive (100 oocysts/ml [Meridian Diagnostics, Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio]) | High cost |
| PCR | Sensitive (1 oocyst) (150); permits genotyping | Nonstandardized methods; high cost; specialized training and equipment required |